You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again?
And what is wrong with making a Chevy EV that is as attractive as a Corvette or Jag EV that looks as appealing as one of the many beautiful Jag designs of the past 50 years? Forgive us for being a little skeptical about their commitment beyond producing compliance vehicles.what is wrong with other manufacturers embracing the viability of making EVs?
nit piking about the cosmetics really doesn't advance the concept of change.
you do realize that a big manufacturer like gm makes cars with many body styles and differing levels of features? some may appeal to you some don't.And what is wrong with making a Chevy EV that is as attractive as a Corvette or Jag EV that looks as appealing as one of the many beautiful Jag designs of the past 50 years? Forgive us for being a little skeptical about their commitment beyond producing compliance vehicles.
I'll reiterate, rather than complain about the cosmetic aspects of what they will be offering we should all celebrate the fact that another "player" understands and wants to participate in the EV revolution.
Actually, I like the front better than the "fish lip" on the Model 3. It looks a lot sportier.It's acceptable but it's not beautiful.
I'm glad Jaguar is making an EV that doesn't look stupid.
Art has a huge impact.what is wrong with other manufacturers embracing the viability of making EVs?
nit piking about the cosmetics really doesn't advance the concept of change.
Yeah, interesting observation. My opinion, it speaks a lot to the structure of the industry. The big players (GM, BMW, et al) have a lot riding on the related parts of the ecosystem - the dealers, suppliers, oil industry and all that involves, etc. If they go all-in on EVs, they risk upsetting those businesses, and therefore their own. They believe it is in their interest to maintain the status quo, and GM especially has been very active in doing so (e.g. their legislative involvements). The smaller or niche players have risks there too, but more potential upside if they can upset the market leaders. What, after all, do they have to lose? So, the big players build ugly or impractical cars in the hopes they won't sell, and the others build nice cars in the hopes that they will.what is wrong with other manufacturers embracing the viability of making EVs?
nit piking about the cosmetics really doesn't advance the concept of change.
What strategy will be most effective in furthering the transformation to electric?
This can't be a serious question on a Tesla board. If the big boys want to save their best designs for ICE, the obvious answer is buy a Tesla. For those who believe $35k is still too expensive, they can pick up a depreciated used Model 3 in a couple years. Why settle for ugly compliance cars?Yeah, interesting observation. My opinion, it speaks a lot to the structure of the industry. The big players (GM, BMW, et al) have a lot riding on the related parts of the ecosystem - the dealers, suppliers, oil industry and all that involves, etc. If they go all-in on EVs, they risk upsetting those businesses, and therefore their own. They believe it is in their interest to maintain the status quo, and GM especially has been very active in doing so (e.g. their legislative involvements). The smaller or niche players have risks there too, but more potential upside if they can upset the market leaders. What, after all, do they have to lose? So, the big players build ugly or impractical cars in the hopes they won't sell, and the others build nice cars in the hopes that they will.
So now the question is, if we (the customers) buy the ugly cars, in spite of their looks, will that encourage more ugly cars? Or will the ugly car makers get the message that it's what's (not) under the hood that really matters, so they better get on board and start making nice looking cars? Or should we only buy the pretty ones? What strategy will be most effective in furthering the transformation to electric?
So now the question is, if we (the customers) buy the ugly cars, in spite of their looks, will that encourage more ugly cars? Or will the ugly car makers get the message that it's what's (not) under the hood that really matters, so they better get on board and start making nice looking cars? Or should we only buy the pretty ones? What strategy will be most effective in furthering the transformation to electric?
Nose makes no aerodynamic sense.
--