Nice try! Taking pictures is a legitimate business purpose for the press. The fact that Tesla might be annoyed by it isn't going to make it trespass or qualify that as the intent of the reporters. Even if the law could be construed that way, the first amendment would render it unconstitutional. Furthermore, a flyover is not "upon the land" or "unto any building."
Could you please clarify what you are trying to say here? Let's break this into two parts, trepass versus a flyover.
In the case of the state of Nevada you are not saying that reporters can't be charged with trespassing simply because they are the press are you?
Thanks.
Larry