and attempted interference against Starlink
Correction: Attempt to ensure Starlink doesn't completely monopolize AND box out competition from physical space and spectrum. One of the responsibilities in owning spectrum for space communications is a pledge to good faith negotiate with other entities who plan to use that spectrum.
When good faith discussions break down...
Then there's
this issue that was the buzz two weeks ago, thankfully it was ultimately [painted as] a success story. More importantly, it highlights how imperative collaboration/dialogue is between entities sharing Space; if someone doesn't want to play nice it is bad for everyone.
we hadn't seen much action over at Amazon's Kuiper project
Correction: We haven't seen
Starlink level PR communications from Kuiper. Anyone who's been paying attention even in public domain would know what kind of positions they've been hiring, would recently they revealed their UT which clearly has been in development for some time, and would generally understand where Kuiper is in the program. Its just that those nuggets of information wouldn't have come from a tweet.
Go figure that one of ULA's only commercial contracts would come from a barely operational company that may never get off the ground, so to speak.
On the flip side, as noted in another post on this matter this is strong indication that Kuiper is serious about getting on orbit sooner rather than later, otherwise they'd be waiting for NG or whoever else. From Kuiper's perspective Atlas 5 is just about the best solution for getting operational on the order of a few years (first launch is probably 2023?). Certainly F9 is the notional best choice for anyone, but we don't know what has transpired between Kuiper and SpaceX/F9--its very possible Kuiper didn't talk to SpaceX for fear of technology appropriation, its possible Kuiper didn't talk to Space for fear of being under the thumb of Elon, its very possible that SpaceX no-bid Kuiper in order to set back what's shaping up to be the most real competition to Starlink.
What's left? Atlas, Ariane, Proton, and H2, plus some rockets in development (NG, A6, Vulcan) and a bunch more sketches (Neutron, Terran R, etc).
Ariane 5, while a big and reliable lifter, does not have the historical manifest volume required for the Kuiper contract, and even though Ariane is down on launches recently, they're not
way down such that [their history shows] they could accomodate many Kuiper launches with the requisite frequency. Ariane is also very keen to get A6 up and running, and for a company in Kuiper's position that's a bit of a risk.
Proton has a litany of reliability, logistical, performance, and sociopolitical problems. I think we can all agree on that one...
H2 launches a couple times a year and only when it pleases the Japanese fishing industry (to be clear, that's no longer actually true), so they're out.
So that leaves Atlas, which has a history of supporting this kind of volume AND has the manifest availability that Kuiper needs (largely because everyone is transitioning to SpaceX). There have been many years of 8-10 AV launches and volume these days is half that. Price is crap but clearly Amazon can afford it, and of course Atlas' reliability is an upside.
Somewhat tin hat (but also quite plausible), at the Jeff level there may also be a knock on effect where the influx of money into ULA enhances/accelerates Vulcan development, which of course has a circular ROI because of BE-4.
And as for Amazon not even selecting Bezos' own rocket, isn't that just, like really embarrassing?
Maybe? Honestly I doubt Jeff cares much. If he cared we would have seen a material pivot from Blue 5 years ago. He/Aamzon is in Kuiper for the money. How the money comes doesn't really matter. And...let's face it, from a business perspective it would be irresponsible for both entities to couple their success/progress to each other. This isn't the singularity of Elon once again betting the farm (Starlink + Starship). Its clear this 9 launch contract with ULA is intended to get a constellation operational over the next few years; its been both planned and obvious for
years that NG would not be able to support this kind of timeline.
It also makes a lot of sense to have a launcher agnostic payload, or at least a payload that is multi-launcher capable. It allows one to better react to groundings and also improves the rate at which mass can be lifted. In fact, if we're looking long term, its easy to imagine a follow-on contract between Kuiper and ULA. NG is going to have some ramp-up rate (not to mention plenty of teething issues) and ULA will enable Kuiper to continue filling out its constellation. At some point Kuiper can continue ULA's launch rate (ostensibly with Vulcan, again paying back at the Jeff level) which would basically accelerate their constellation deployment, or they can pull back on the ULA rate as the NG rate ramps up.
Having options and off/onramps is a sound commercial strategy in any industry, let alone the space biz.
One barely needs to scratch the surface on this one to realize it's an outstanding move for Kuiper.