Tesla Worker Says Firing Timing Denied Him Lucrative Shares
Platt v Tesla Motors Inc., RG17873032, California Superior Court, Alameda County case claims that a fired Tesla worker was denied of exercising an option of buying very cheap shares when he was terminated 1 year after employment.
Tesla said he is not entitled to but it will take a look to "do what's fair".
Platt v Tesla Motors Inc., RG17873032, California Superior Court, Alameda County case claims that a fired Tesla worker was denied of exercising an option of buying very cheap shares when he was terminated 1 year after employment.
Tesla said he is not entitled to but it will take a look to "do what's fair".