You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are two primary reasons:Seriously, why? I find it so frustrating that information regarding Model S onwards is kept so private. Tesla is working so hard to keep their 'secrets', they really don't need us to help them
Why the secrecy? The last few posts sound like an episode of Penn and Teller fool us.
Seriously, why? I find it so frustrating that information regarding Model S onwards is kept so private. Tesla is working so hard to keep their 'secrets', they really don't need us to help them. People working on opening up the roadster were so much more open to sharing (and still are, perhaps even more so now than before).
Exploits, I understand (not wanting the mothership to know); but let's face it, with the bug bounty program they know anyway. Security and safety issues, fine; we don't want to make it easy for the bad guys. But CAN bus messages, decodes, instructionals, howtos, firmware access, etc?
These are our vehicles. We purchased them, we own them, and we should have the right to do with them whatever we want. The sharing of information is key to that movement, and quite frankly, FUN. I think that even Elon would agree with that.
Because well-known vulnerabilities are going to get plugged, and those with access want to keep it.
Because some of the people with this technical information are using it to make and sell products and they don't want to share the information when it could end up cutting into their profits.
Wouldn't officially participating in the bug bounty program pretty much be a CYA and prevent retaliation? Seems like that is exactly what Tesla wants peeps to do. No?
Why the secrecy? The last few posts sound like an episode of Penn and Teller fool us.
Seriously, why? I find it so frustrating that information regarding Model S onwards is kept so private. Tesla is working so hard to keep their 'secrets', they really don't need us to help them. People working on opening up the roadster were so much more open to sharing (and still are, perhaps even more so now than before).
Exploits, I understand (not wanting the mothership to know); but let's face it, with the bug bounty program they know anyway. Security and safety issues, fine; we don't want to make it easy for the bad guys. But CAN bus messages, decodes, instructionals, howtos, firmware access, etc?
These are our vehicles. We purchased them, we own them, and we should have the right to do with them whatever we want. The sharing of information is key to that movement, and quite frankly, FUN. I think that even Elon would agree with that.
I did specifically exclude exploits, security and safety issues. Those I understand have sensitivity, and retaliatory issues, to some extent. That said, I've participated in the Tesla bug bounty program, and been hacking in the open on Teslas for 8 years now - with nothing but excellent support from Tesla.
My comments are primarily about things like those I listed: CAN bus messages, decodes, instructionals, howtos, firmware access, etc
There are two primary reasons:
- Because well-known vulnerabilities are going to get plugged, and those with access want to keep it.
- Because some of the people with this technical information are using it to make and sell products and they don't want to share the information when it could end up cutting into their profits.
I agree wholeheartedly. There is way more secrecy and elitism in the Tesla tinkering community than can be explained by fear of an exploit being patched. I started Unofficial Tesla Service Manual for this very reason -- to show that DIY Tesla maintenance really is possible, and that you don't need hacker or security research credentials to do it. I think you've motivated me to add more material to that site in the coming weeks, and I'd love it if anybody else who feels similarly would contribute.
Wow. Maybe my AP won't fail on sight the first snow flake now! This should have been a PSA for all cold weather AP owners.I agree wholeheartedly. There is way more secrecy and elitism in the Tesla tinkering community than can be explained by fear of an exploit being patched. I started Unofficial Tesla Service Manual for this very reason -- to show that DIY Tesla maintenance really is possible, and that you don't need hacker or security research credentials to do it. I think you've motivated me to add more material to that site in the coming weeks, and I'd love it if anybody else who feels similarly would contribute.
Does it not fetch them over SSL?
There are two primary reasons:
- Because well-known vulnerabilities are going to get plugged, and those with access want to keep it.
- Because some of the people with this technical information are using it to make and sell products and they don't want to share the information when it could end up cutting into their profits.
It is indeed possible without getting root access to the CID. IC is wide open (kinda). Still IC has exactly the same firmware as the CID does. So - get into IC, dump it there, copy to your PC. Easy. Problem is - technically it is rooting. Despite being easy to get into IC you still need root access there to dump firmware. So statement still stands - rooting is needed, unless there is other way I have missed here.Absence of demonstration is keeping me from believing you. Although you're in a country where Tesla barely supports owners, you might have a clever way...
It is rooting and also you can't reach the IC over the APE's port AFAIK (the original question was if it is possible to get fw off the car without root through the APE's port)It is indeed possible without getting root access to the CID. IC is wide open (kinda). Still IC has exactly the same firmware as the CID does. So - get into IC, dump it there, copy to your PC. Easy. Problem is - technically it is rooting. Despite being easy to get into IC you still need root access there to dump firmware. So statement still stands - rooting is needed, unless there is other way I have missed here.
that does not require root. that is a configuration option with toolbox.It looks like a lot of fun.
While you are hacking did you come across how to set the bit (flag) that the bio-filter is installed? I did not get my car with the bio-filter, but I am willing to add one...
you get access through the firewall if you have a legit toolbox running.It is rooting and also you can't reach the IC over the APE's port AFAIK (the original question was if it is possible to get fw off the car without root through the APE's port)
I don't need you to explain, I'm aware how seceth works. Someone asked a bit ago if it was possible to dump firmware from the car without having root, all through the APE port. That's the topic I was replying toyou get access through the firewall if you have a legit toolbox running.
pm me and i will explain.