You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know it's not physically, but I think of the battery as a tank full of fuel. If it costs me say 100 quid to fil it up, but if I only ever empty half of it before refilling then I have over spent to what I actually need by 50 quid.. It comes back to only charging what you need plus a margin. So while the values are different the principle will be the same.I don't see how charging vs not charging will actually save money. Unless a battery is allowed to fully empty & stay in that state, it will gradually deplete regardless of whether it's topped up or not. There will be 'cost' either way.
Top up at a high charge with a little or at a low charge with a lot, the end result is the same & it's always draining to some extent.
From the endless amount of YouTube videos I have watched, I can confirm this is true for MIC models.I think for the MiC models there is no longer a daily/trip split on the charge screen
Fill a fuel tank to 50%, leave untouched for a month at any time throughout the year & it still has 50%I know it's not physically, but I think of the battery as a tank full of fuel. If it costs me say 100 quid to fil it up, but if I only ever empty half of it before refilling then I have over spent to what I actually need by 50 quid.. It comes back to only charging what you need plus a margin. So while the values are different the principle will be the same.
That is interesting and backs up the whole “charge it to 100% if you like” suggestion.From the endless amount of YouTube videos I have watched, I can confirm this is true for MIC models.
Exactly. I’ve read all the advice to date on the previous battery types. This new type which I now have in my car, I’d like specifics on how it behaves and how I should use / maintain it.Yeah that was the whole point of this question right? Specifically about the new chemistry.
And yeah I wouldn't simply because then you have no regen braking to start with.
When the battery reaches whatever level is deemed to be 100% (irrespective of whether that is actually 1000% or only 98%) the battery management system will not allow any more electrons to be added to the battery - whether by a plugged in charger or by the onboard regen charger.Based on the previous battery chemistry that would be true ... however, if the pack is really designed for frequent 100% charge then it's possible they have allowed a buffer at the top end that would allow regen even when charged to 100%. We can get the answer to this question from somebody with an LFP battery pack ... so do you get regen after charging to 100% ?... we need to know!
That’s a completely reasonable hypothesis but it would actually be possible to allow regen charging beyond the buffer if the system was designed that way. I do agree that it’s most likely the cars are the same as the rest of us with a brief period of no regen at 100 %. We have several people who have sr+ Cars with the lfp battery packs so the question of whether they get regen at 100% can easily be answered.... if only someone would tell us!When the battery reaches whatever level is deemed to be 100% (irrespective of whether that is actually 1000% or only 98%) the battery management system will not allow any more electrons to be added to the battery - whether by a plugged in charger or by the onboard regen charger.
So, I have a MIC SR+, I can comment. It can definitely charge to 100% via the charging scale on UI. My question is related to whether it’s recommended not to. Not opinion, but actually recommended practice. There’s no indicator for trip vs daily etc on the new charging screen for LFP. I’m therefore curious to know if that means there’s no longer a need to think of charges for longer routes vs regular charging to 100% and therefore getting the max range possible when setting out each day.That’s a completely reasonable hypothesis but it would actually be possible to allow regen charging beyond the buffer if the system was designed that way. I do agree that it’s most likely the cars are the same as the rest of us with a brief period of no regen at 100 %. We have several people who have sr+ Cars with the lfp battery packs so the question of whether they get regen at 100% can easily be answered.... if only someone would tell us!
So, I have a MIC SR+, I can comment. It can definitely charge to 100% via the charging scale on UI. My question is related to whether it’s recommended not to. Not opinion, but actually recommended practice. There’s no indicator for trip vs daily etc on the new charging screen for LFP. I’m therefore curious to know if that means there’s no longer a need to think of charges for longer routes vs regular charging to 100% and therefore getting the max range possible when setting out each day.
I have charged my MIC LFP SR+ to 100% each charge (weekly so far as not driving much). Each time I have still had regen, even at the start of my 3 mile “commute”.I don't think anyone has a definitive answer. Clearly 100% will be much less of an issue for you so you can indeed maximise your range more effectively. I think all that people are saying meantime is that if you know there isn't a chance of needing more than 100miles next day why put 100% in the battery. Those of us with the other type of battery find that at 100% we have a period without regenerative braking. Is that the case for you? On our cars there's actually a warning pops up on the screen warning that there will be no regen available when you first start out if charged to 100%. When you are used to regen braking it's a bit of a pain to be without it so that alone may suggest 95% is a better option. So ... does your car have regen when at 100%?
I’ll check and let you knowI don't think anyone has a definitive answer. Clearly 100% will be much less of an issue for you so you can indeed maximise your range more effectively. I think all that people are saying meantime is that if you know there isn't a chance of needing more than 100miles next day why put 100% in the battery. Those of us with the other type of battery find that at 100% we have a period without regenerative braking. Is that the case for you? On our cars there's actually a warning pops up on the screen warning that there will be no regen available when you first start out if charged to 100%. When you are used to regen braking it's a bit of a pain to be without it so that alone may suggest 95% is a better option. So ... does your car have regen when at 100%?
Yes that’s the regen behaviour we see with the model 3 at 100%. Different manufacturers use different buffers so the sensitivity about charging to 100 is less, which is why we are trying to get a handle on how the LFP pack behaves. Tesla have said to some people that 100 is fine but we are trying to clarify if it’s still advantageous to put in a lower percentage or is that now a thing of the past.I've charged our i3 to full for a long time (since it has a small battery) - after 5 years it's still got the same range - doesn't the 'buffer' they add to the battery at new cope with the degradation over time? I'm picking up a MIC SR+ on weds - and I doubt I'll change our charging behaviour, especially as I imagine we'll be getting a new one in a few years.
Regarding the regen braking - the i3 didn't brake much or at all when it's battery was full and sometimes would feel like it was running away when you lifted the accelerator as you do get used to the auto braking. You get used to this and expect it after fully charging.
You get a little regen but it’s inept above 85% charge.My new car will have the same battery. I am not sure you will get regen breaking if it’s topped up to 100 every time.
The car prompted you to charge at lower than 100% ? Which software version are you on ?I also have a March 21 MIC and couldn’t give a stuff about degradation. I charged my car to 100% each night and on day 10 with 270 miles covered I got a pop-up saying to reduce the charge level.