€119.000
100 units scheduled for 2020 production. Plans to increase production in 2021
100 units scheduled for 2020 production. Plans to increase production in 2021
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm confused why anyone would be interested in it. I guess it could improve in the future, though.
At the current price it obviously has a very limited market. But it's only so expensive because the first series will be mostly built by hand. In the long run, this may actually have the potential to be less expensive than "traditional" EVs, since it can make do with a smaller battery due to its "ultra efficiency". Of course that also means it's not for people who want high performance. But I like the idea of using the car for an average commute without ever having to plug in (just park in the sun at work ).I'm confused why anyone would be interested in it. I guess it could improve in the future, though.
€119.000
Solar panels to work efficiently must face the sun,
and as most as possible perpendicularly to the sun.
This is possible mostly from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm, so 25% for a normal sunny day.
Just buy an electric car and install at your home some solar panels and battery with the rest of the money.
If you have some money left, buy an eolienne which can work day and night, and provides some juice for overcast days.
Interesting perspective. Depending of the future price of battery versus solar panels,Most people on this site know the former and the second is conventional wisdom here on this site.
The team of engineers that are making this car won the Australian World Solar Challenge in 2013, 2015, and 2017 against such poorly funded teams like Honda. IMO that gives them a tad of credibility.
They claim their solar cells are 20% more efficient and the Lightyear One will be able to charge at 12 km per hour in the noon sun.
I say give them two years to deliver a car to the public and let the car magazines test the vehicle before we take a big huge dump on the company.
In 2006 there was a large list of parameters that conventional wisdom had about electric vehicles.
In 2008 the Tesla Roadster shattered them.
As it stands now, no, I don't think anyone will want one. It is too expensive, sacrifices too much, and for very little gain. I think the appeal is in the future possibilities.
One of those "future possibilities" is that a car that charges itself from the sun would be a big advantage for people who live in apartments or apartment-style condos, and who therefore don't have ready access to charging infrastructure. If the car can get 20 or 30 miles of range a day off of sunlight, then that will greatly reduce the need to go out of one's way to charge it, thus improving the appeal of the car. Even if the solar power isn't enough to provide all of the electricity needed to drive the car over, say, a month, the reduction in the number of times needed to visit a DC fast charger, plug in at the grocery store, etc., could be an important selling point.
I agree that would be a selling point. But wouldn't it be easier just to install accessible chargers in apartment complexes?
They claim their solar cells are 20% more efficient and the Lightyear One will be able to charge at 12 km per hour in the noon sun.
This is with the current 20% efficiency rated panels. I've heard from an EE associate that they have crossed the 40% threshold in PV design with only military/aerospace having access to these prototypes so far. Game-changing stuff is on the horizon (as always).As it stands now, no, I don't think anyone will want one. It is too expensive, sacrifices too much, and for very little gain. I think the appeal is in the future possibilities. If the tech could be improved drastically, it could be very appealing. I think it is more the "big idea" that is driving this project. After all, IF you had an EV that could truly self-charge on solar and never needed to be plugged in, you would have a car with near infinite range. That would be game-changer. We are far from achieving that now, but as with all tech, it can improve over time. A lot of tech started off really impractical but over time, improved to become essential. Just look at the first Wright airplane. The first plane that the Wright brothers built was not very good but look at planes now.
In 2006 there was a large list of parameters that conventional wisdom had about electric vehicles.
In 2008 the Tesla Roadster shattered them.
This is with the current 20% efficiency rated panels. I've heard from an EE associate that they have crossed the 40% threshold in PV design with only military/aerospace having access to these prototypes so far. Game-changing stuff is on the horizon (as always).
What about solar trains... I found this video quite inspiring:
World's First Solar Train - Byron Bay Railroad Company