-
We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser.
With EPA testing showing combined cycle range of 335, I've wondered how Tesla handled its down-rate to 310. Three possibilities came to mind:
Hide the "top" of the battery, calling 93% "100%" ... thereby reducing degradation risk from range charging.
Hide the "bottom" of the battery, calling 7% "0%" ... thereby reducing run-dry risk.
Squoosh the space in between, making range miles closer to actual miles ... thereby reducing risk of disappointed owners.
Any or all would seem sensible for a car that must play to a widened audience.
What are your thoughts?