jcaspar
Member
Maybe 90% of ophthalmologists, but certainly not 90% of the Tesla owners I know.
Not this ophthalmologist! Love my P85 and will likely keep it for 10+ years.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe 90% of ophthalmologists, but certainly not 90% of the Tesla owners I know.
I think the original technology package promised us 7 years of map updates.
The difference is most gadgets don't cost in the high five figures. Replacing a Tesla is a different level of financial commitment than replacing an iPhone. Most "classic" Tesla owners bought the car to drive an EV and aren't that interested in autopilot or other gimmicks.People who think they are going to be happy with their Tesla many years in the future are (wrongly, in my opinion) thinking of it as a car. It's not. It's a gadget. Do any of you still use your original 2007 iPhone? I have one. We call it the iBrick and use it as an alarm clock. I believe our current cars will be similarly hopelessly slow and obsolete a few years down the road.
Yes, you can buy an LTE upgrade, but most hardware upgrades won't be that self-contained or simple. You can't go D. You won't be able to get the new sensor suite when it comes out, so self-driving will never happen. When the crowded supercharger protocol becomes "just park your car nearby and go about your business; when your turn comes it will drive over, hook itself to the charger, and re-park itself when done" you'll still be the one dealing with your car manually.
People just don't keep their gadgets that long because they become better so fast. This car-like gadget will be no different.
People who think they are going to be happy with their Tesla many years in the future are (wrongly, in my opinion) thinking of it as a car. It's not. It's a gadget. Do any of you still use your original 2007 iPhone? I have one. We call it the iBrick and use it as an alarm clock. I believe our current cars will be similarly hopelessly slow and obsolete a few years down the road.
The difference is most gadgets don't cost in the high five figures. Replacing a Tesla is a different level of financial commitment than replacing an iPhone. Most "classic" Tesla owners bought the car to drive an EV and aren't that interested in autopilot or other gimmicks.
Bet TSLA;1300793 But the replacement will be almost as much as the Blue Book value of the car. So really the only sensible way to get your new battery is to get rid of the old car and get a new one.[/QUOTE said:that's a bit less sustainable then Elon says. I now have a 70D and would be ready to pay 10-15k to have a 95kwh battery in a 5 years. The car will be still in good condition I hope, i think it is in the interest of the planet to reuse as much as possible.
Phil
Agreed about Supercharging. However, the original deal was much shorter for 3G/LTE (length depending upon whether you purchased a Sig or not), so the extra time is free because there was no additional cost.Is wrong to say the LTE service in your Model S is free for 4 years. The correct statement is that the service is "prepaid." Same for Supercharging.
People who think they are going to be happy with their Tesla many years in the future are (wrongly, in my opinion) thinking of it as a car. It's not. It's a gadget....
People just don't keep their gadgets that long because they become better so fast. This car-like gadget will be no different.
I would guestimate 90% of Tesla owners will have sold the car prior to 4 years anyways.
That is laughable. A decade from now a 2012 Model S will be a far more advanced and sophisticated car than half the cars people are driving in the US. It will also be just as "fast" and speed limits will be the same so newer cars will have no advantage over it. It's aluminum body will not be rusted put so that will be fine. It's motor will likely be running just fine and its power output will be the same. It's battery will still have 90% of its original capacity and if desired a new battery will be available with more capacity and at a far lower price than it is now.People who think they are going to be happy with their Tesla many years in the future are (wrongly, in my opinion) thinking of it as a car. It's not. It's a gadget. Do any of you still use your original 2007 iPhone? I have one. We call it the iBrick and use it as an alarm clock. I believe our current cars will be similarly hopelessly slow and obsolete a few years down the road.
That is laughable. A decade from now a 2012 Model S will be a far more advanced and sophisticated car than half the cars people are driving in the US.
Given the drivers I've seen here in Texas and the number of accidents on 75 and 635 when the speed limit was raised to 70 in sections of it, well, I guess that would be one way to reduce population.I would hope speed limits would continue the slow advance and perhaps accelerate. If the public could tolerate more aerodynamic cars and batteries get bigger and computers do the driving, I don't see why 100 mph wouldn't be possible in the West.
I hesitate to ever say "it's not the money" (because it's almost ALWAYS the money) -- but IMHO this needs to be clearly defined, especially for the benefit of M3 prospects, many of whom are working on their Total Cost of Ownership worksheets already. Not that there have been a rash of service changes that negatively impact customers (I can really only think of 2 since I took ownership, the "local Supercharging" letters and the loss of alignment [if needed] as part of the annual inspection) but I'm really just not sure what to expect from the car's cell connection or Slacker, or map updates (which are costly in some cars).With the amount of data actually used and the possibility of jumping on a family plan, we aren't talking more than $10 a month anyway.