http://170.63.40.34/DPU/FileRoomAPI/api/Attachments/Get/?path=17-05/1705B_Order_1518.pdf
Not much in the 345 pages reads like you'd think MA rolls. We're a deregulated state, known for efforts in renewables and efficiencies. Solar perks are declining just about everywhere, but to see demand charges among the MA solutions (rather than reduced net metering, or SRECs) is a real shot across the bow. We're seeking 200MWh of battery storage. So, instead of incensing a need for it to shift peak consumption to off-peak, commercial customers will need it, along with smarter metering solutions, to prevent demand charges.
Within docket 17-05, the DPU itself reiterated an Eversource claim that only ".02 percent", or 1 in 5,000 customers, takes advantage of TOU. I am not sure I buy that, or the idea they were ever passing along the accurate savings represented from over-night wholesale energy costs. This past cold spell, daytime wholesale market rates have been through the roof ($100-150/MWh).
Not much in the 345 pages reads like you'd think MA rolls. We're a deregulated state, known for efforts in renewables and efficiencies. Solar perks are declining just about everywhere, but to see demand charges among the MA solutions (rather than reduced net metering, or SRECs) is a real shot across the bow. We're seeking 200MWh of battery storage. So, instead of incensing a need for it to shift peak consumption to off-peak, commercial customers will need it, along with smarter metering solutions, to prevent demand charges.
Within docket 17-05, the DPU itself reiterated an Eversource claim that only ".02 percent", or 1 in 5,000 customers, takes advantage of TOU. I am not sure I buy that, or the idea they were ever passing along the accurate savings represented from over-night wholesale energy costs. This past cold spell, daytime wholesale market rates have been through the roof ($100-150/MWh).