Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Making solar panels add to the look of your home

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

Skotty

2014 S P85 | 2023 F-150L
Jun 27, 2013
2,686
2,270
Kansas City, MO
Straight from the Tesla blog post about Tesla offering to acquire SolarCity was this fun little nugget:

"We would be able to maximize and build on the core competencies of each company. Tesla’s experience in design, engineering, and manufacturing should help continue to advance solar panel technology, including by making solar panels add to the look of your home."​

I'm curious to see what people think of this. Might be a fun little topic for discussion. While cost and efficiency are paramount, It almost sounds like they also want to improve the look of solar panel installations. It might seem silly at first to give weight to aesthetics, but people do care how things look and looking good does offer a competitive advantage. What opportunities might there be to improve the look of solar panel installations?

Personally, I'd like to see some triangular panel offerings to better fit available roof space. In addition to maximizing how much you can fit on the roof, I think it would look better as well. There have been a couple of triangular panel offerings that we have touched on in other threads, but the offerings to date have been very limited (and perhaps discontinued as well?).
 
Yes, I'm also quite curios as to what these solar modules would look like. I think its pretty clear that they will black but in which other way the aesthetics can be improved, I don't know. Maybe as you said by offering triangular shapes.
I also think we will know before the end of the year. The Buffalo SolarCity factory should be online by then.
 
Elon mentioned this in the conference call this morning as well. Having panels that add $5K of aesthetics to the roof, rather than subtracting $5K.

For this, I think they'd have to go in a number of directions:

1. I would presume that the panels have to be all black, with no white lines. SunPower is currently one of the leaders in this regard.

2. They need to fit the roof with the right proportions and spaces.

3. They need to have an "invisa-mount" system and preferably even hide the panel-to-panel seams.

I did a quick search, and the best example I found was this A-Frame house. Looks pretty good with panels, to my eyes. If they were able to hide the panel seams, you'd have pretty close to an all-black roof with a nice wood outline.

solar-system-and-photovoltaic-mountain-house.jpg
 
FWIW, I had SolarCity do a 16kW install (64 panels) about 2 years ago. They used Canadian Solar panels. All black. Low profile hidden mounting brackets. Black skirts all around to hide the gaps. Looks pretty good on my black composition shingle roof. Also, the SolarCity planners & installers bent over backwards to site the 4 strings of panels in areas of the roof that were not very visible from the street.
 
Sunflower Power.jpg
These, at an I-70 rest area East of Grand Junction, make me smile.

Someday when enough people have tried to hide their panels, Sylvester McMonkey McBean will come to town and peddle terrific ways to make them stand out! :)
 
hile cost and efficiency are paramount, It almost sounds like they also want to improve the look of solar panel installations. It might seem silly at first to give weight to aesthetics, but people do care how things look
I sure do. In August I am having 9.6kW of all black SunPower panels put on my roof. They cost a bit more, but I don't like seeing the multitude of silver lines in typical,panels.
 
Last edited:
Lots of retro-fit PV here in the UK - "stuck on" to the roof. Doesn't bother me, as I like to see the country making the move to renewable energy, but not everyone shares that view!

We have a new-built extension, and we mounted the PV panels "flush" using Panasonic panels which are black (and cost more than the ones with non-black edging surround). Because it was a new roof we just put wriggy-tin sheets under them, and then slates flush-ish to them for the remainder of the roof. We also have solar-thermal panels, and sky-lights, so overall the effect is not entirely "flush-fitting", but we did what we could to make them look unobtrusive.

IMG_2342_PV.jpg


IMG_4641_PV.jpg
 
Straight from the Tesla blog post about Tesla offering to acquire SolarCity was this fun little nugget:

"We would be able to maximize and build on the core competencies of each company. Tesla’s experience in design, engineering, and manufacturing should help continue to advance solar panel technology, including by making solar panels add to the look of your home."​

I'm curious to see what people think of this. Might be a fun little topic for discussion. While cost and efficiency are paramount, It almost sounds like they also want to improve the look of solar panel installations. It might seem silly at first to give weight to aesthetics, but people do care how things look and looking good does offer a competitive advantage. What opportunities might there be to improve the look of solar panel installations?

Personally, I'd like to see some triangular panel offerings to better fit available roof space. In addition to maximizing how much you can fit on the roof, I think it would look better as well. There have been a couple of triangular panel offerings that we have touched on in other threads, but the offerings to date have been very limited (and perhaps discontinued as well?).

I read it as positive sign that Model 3 design is complete and the team is looking for something to do.
 
There are some panels designed to look like shingles so that people who believe esthetics come before trivial matters like sustainability, health, economic stability and security will deign to install them on their roofs.

I think the statement and others were really code for "SolarCity's marketing sucks ass, we'll cut costs and do better."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Topher
We found our realtor advised strongly against putting panels on a street side roof, owing to a supposed negative effect on resale value. There are panels available that are integral with the shingle so they replace older roofing. However, the coverage is not quite as efficient, though perhaps they can be more flexibly installed to maximize the covered fraction of the roof. It'll be interesting to see what Tesla brings to Solar City if this goes forward...
 
We found our realtor advised strongly against putting panels on a street side roof, owing to a supposed negative effect on resale value.

That's debatable though, with solar becoming more popular and with Tesla talking about making panels improve the look of your house. More important however is that usually you don't have a choice of being that picky if you want solar. You are already lucky if you have any roof space at all that would support rooftop solar. Many houses either don't have enough useful roof space or are excessively shaded. In my particular neighborhood, probably only 1 in 4 houses are viable for rooftop solar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaff and ThosEM