Mike Smith
Active Member
I think a lot of shorts are going to be looking to take profits all at the same time and it will spark a ferocious rally just like it did when the last delivery numbers were announced.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think a lot of shorts are going to be looking to take profits all at the same time and it will spark a ferocious rally just like it did when the last delivery numbers were announced.
Except I believe in Q3 conference call Tesla said they'd update us on production status when numbers come out right after EOQ (as in, just about now).I hope so, but I think the key will be number of cars not delivered but en-route for delivery. And if the number can be broken down to include lots of Model 3 then I think that'll help with guessing on production rate. I doubt the report will include production rate since it's unprecedented - at least I never read them in the delivery reports before.
Another missed chance for CNBC to take a sell-side analyst to task. Osborne has definitely been making the rounds the past couple or few days. Some of what he has to say is actually laughable.
Here's why Telsa is a 'concept stock': Analyst
Another missed chance for CNBC to take a sell-side analyst to task. Osborne has definitely been making the rounds the past couple or few days. Some of what he has to say is actually laughable.
Here's why Telsa is a 'concept stock': Analyst
He seems to have a great track record (sarcasm, of course).He's a smart boy, he cuts his forecast for 17Q4 after 17Q4 has ended. Do they actually pay him a salary for this incredible feat of percipience?
Another missed chance for CNBC to take a sell-side analyst to task. Osborne has definitely been making the rounds the past couple or few days. Some of what he has to say is actually laughable.
Here's why Telsa is a 'concept stock': Analyst
There's no way Tesla is doing > 1K/week now. They haven't sent out any more invites for at least a week. They've probably run into some other problems
There's no way Tesla is doing > 1K/week now. They haven't sent out any more invites for at least a week. They've probably run into some other problems
Christmas vacation.There's no way Tesla is doing > 1K/week now. They haven't sent out any more invites for at least a week. They've probably run into some other problems
Has to do with the SEC going AWOL. Financial media probably have the same standards now that they did in the 1900s or 1920s before the SEC.The intro to the CNBC video reads:
Jeffrey Osborne, Cowen & Company, discusses why he's cutting his price target for Tesla.
He did not cut his price target. In August he raised it to $170 from $155. It remains at $170 today.
The financial media need to take special care to publish correct information. Industry standards have really deteriorated since I retired.
He's a smart boy, he cuts his forecast for 17Q4 after 17Q4 has ended. Do they actually pay him a salary for this incredible feat of percipience?
-1.2% when we are 10 years into a stock rally? Tell me there is a monkey or dartboard that could have done worse?Jeffrey Osborne of Cowen is ranked near the bottom for analysts and experts by TipRanks. Success rate 47%. Returns of -1.2%. He initiated his coverage of TSLA with an underperform rating and $160 target price in September 2016. Now he's making the media rounds while regurgitating his antii-TSLA thesis. He may be hoping he accidentally gets it right this time so he can keep his career.
https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/jeff-osborne
-1.2% when we are 10 years into a stock rally? Tell me there is a monkey or dartboard that could have done worse?
It is interesting that every analyst I am aware of with a low Tesla price target, is at the bottom in terms of ability. I don't understand how they have a job, or get press coverage. When they show up on TV, the first thing that should be mentioned in the introduction, is "So, Mr. Osborne, you are one of the worst analysts on record, and are basically always wrong. Please give us your opinion on Tesla..."
Jeffrey Osborne of Cowen is ranked near the bottom for analysts and experts by TipRanks. Success rate 47%. Returns of -1.2%. He initiated his coverage of TSLA with an underperform rating and $160 target price in September 2016. Now he's making the media rounds while regurgitating his antii-TSLA thesis. He may be hoping he accidentally gets it right this time so he can keep his career.
https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/jeff-osborne
It is interesting that every analyst I am aware of with a low Tesla price target, is at the bottom in terms of ability. I don't understand how they have a job, or get press coverage. When they show up on TV, the first thing that should be mentioned in the introduction, is "So, Mr. Osborne, you are one of the worst analysts on record, and are basically always wrong. Please give us your opinion on Tesla..."