I simply do not buy some of the reasons stated in that response. They say some kind of pavement markings are required to enforce any parking violation in Maryland. Think about that... do all reserved parking spots have pavement markings? No, of course not. That doesn't keep the police from giving tickets!
The only pavement markings that seem to be ubiquitous are at handicapped parking spots and those pavement markings are voluntary and NOT required by Maryland Code according to the Chief of Compliance in the Maryland Codes Administration.
Note the use of the phrase, "we have been told by law enforcement." That could mean that a single policeman has told them something that may or may not be backed up by facts.
The amendment that was added to accommodate curb-side charging spots on public roadways -- that affects only four charging stations in the entire state on Maryland that I know of. The reason for that narrow exception is the color green is not legal to use on public roads. Seven out of the eight states that have anti-ICEing laws do not require any sort of pavement markings. Neither do any of the three Maryland counties that have anti-ICEing laws.
A reason the sponsor wants green paint is to "brand" EV charging stations. In my opinion, that's not a reason to legislate green instead of white.
You may wish to voice your opinion to the members of the House Environment and Transportation Committee. They will vote on this any day now. Here is the
list of members. Click on the names in the left row to show the phone numbers to call - it's better than writing.
Here is a photo of the garage near the Capitol in Annapolis that the lawmakers park in. The state agency that operates the garage took eight months to fix that charging station when it broke. Imagine how long it will take them to paint green pavement markings.