I base it on 568km*137Wh/km estimate, but off by a fraction and it could be off by 0.5kWh.). Where does your 79kWh value come from?
Yeah, we do the same math then:
2020 LR -> 499 x 152,5 -> 77,1kWh threshold
2021 LR -> 568 x 137,0 -> 77,8kWh threshold
"2022" LR -> 568 x 140,0 -> 79,5kWh threshold??? On SMT it looked like 79kWh Usable remaining was the point at which the maximum range was shown.
Makes me think they fixed their garbage 2170 batteries.
Were they really? The degradation reports by users in Germany with the old 2019/2020 LR/P cars are not bad at all. My capacity in the 2020 P might not have been lost, but the BMS didnt like my charging habbit of 20%-90% every three days or so.
The new 82kWh packs seem to degrade less though or their BMS is just smarter.
have not seen a new LR which charges or reports NFP above 80kWh. I don’t know whether this is due to “binning” of the packs (lower capacity 2170L packs go in LRs), or due to software limitation to keep NFP below 80kWh, or if it is due to an insufficient sample of vehicles (I have only seen a couple captures - you have likely seen more). I also have not seen the voltage readout from an LR 82.1kWh pack charged to 100% (that might clear up if it were an artificial cap since the voltage might be lower if so - but they could also limit the low end cutoff). You probably have better info than I do on this - it sounds like you have seen the new packs charged to 100% - but again the (potentially artificial) capacity limit can be imposed by a bottom-end higher voltage limit as well.
I just figured that if there were no software limit we would have seen an 81kWh NFP report from an LR by now. But no idea. If 81.5kWh NFP LR (non-P) vehicles have been captured by SMT then there is clearly not a limitation. Just a lot of variability!
Well, I have posted screenshots of the new Long Range hitting 80,5kWh Nominal Full Pack. Apart from its cell imbalance, all the voltage and capacity values were exactly identical to my Performance 2021. I have seen a few Performance 2021 models having below 80kWh down to 79,1kWh from the factory. Also we havent seen much SMT data from the new 82 LR. Not even from the Performance actually. AAKEE and me provided some data, but the sample size is pretty low so far. Also the way I charge the car does not balance the BMS to the highest possible capacity in contrast to AAKEE, who does exactly that.
I am pretty sure that in the next weeks we will see a lot more data from the new long range and we will find that the battery pack is reaching the exact same peak voltages, cell imbalance and usable capacity as the performance pack...even having the same sticker glued onto it.
You confirm it s a LR E3LD, I suppose ?
No, I cant. The same user posted the same picture in a German Forum without giving details to which car that sticker belongs to.