First, please learn to quote properly. It makes the posts a lot easier to read.
That's a nice set-up. Wind is the key esp on cloudy days.. Besides, if we could get past the light spectrum issues solar could work on cloudy days.
I'm not sure what the "light spectrum issues" which you refer to are in this context. Yes, a lot of effort is being put into making PV cells which can harvest energy from more wavelengths (multi-junction etc), but that does not cover every type of solar plant and does not preclude the use of today's cells in a real-world plant.
Any installation can 1) be sized for the worst case period (winter) and 2) include batteries as a buffer or export back to the grid etc.
Does Home Solar Power Generation Work on Cloudy Days
Perhaps one of the most popular myths about the use of solar energy is that on days when the weather is stormy or there is not much sunshine, that anyone who relies solely on solar power will simply have to shut down operations and make do. Fortunately, this is not the case for several reasons.
...
For instance, the United Kingdom on average experiences 2.5 hours of energy producing sunlight per day over the course of a year. This average is more than sufficient with current technology to handle the power demands of the average household without draining the solar modules down to nothing
So, even with that much average sunlight (which other calculations so includes cosine losses), I could run a Roadster for around 8000 miles per year in the UK from panels on my own small garage. Add a mini wind turbine and you have enough for peoples' average mileage.
However, it won't be possible for many people to do this (lack of garage, etc), so that is why it is important that the desert solar stations and continental super-grid are set up.
Okay.. I just grabbed this CO2 site quickly and hit the same wite you just quoted. We really can;t put an exact finger on CO2 dangers
But we can start to put boundaries around them.
Which the overwhelming balance of scientific evidence (not modelling) now says they do.
No it isn't. It's a consistent theory backed up by masses of data.
There's direct evidence and there's a multitude of circumstancial evidence - thousands of different seemingly non-linked effects - that when taken together point to only one thing. You seem to have an issue with this. The people that claim climate change is blind faith or a new religion are the very people that ignore the science and have blind faith in the opposite.
We also don't know whether this solar cycle 24 is going to throw something at Earth that humans have ever experienced before.
Of course, there are variations in the solar cycle which can't be predicted. However, the variability in the incident energy at Earth over previous cycles was ~0.1%. This translates to a variation in temperature of 0.1 deg C, or 20% of the rise measured over the last century. In other words, although the Sun has an influence, something else is driving the overall trend. Even if the next solar maximum is very quiet, it will not stop this rise.
The STS on the MEALER-STS engine description is more or less something to throw off intelligent engineers who patent protection cannot deter...
As vfx said, please quote your patent numbers. If you have them, there should be nothing to fear in doing that.
I am not here to argue with you. Do you feel threatened?
Such as in China, etc.
Do I feel threatened? No.
Do I have blind faith in anyone that turns up and says "I have this magic solution to the World's problems, trust me"? No.
You may think you are not here to argue, but by turning up and saying that everyone else's view on the issues and/or solutions to them is wrong, that is exactly what you have done. Other people may take what you have to say at face value. As you can see, many here don't.
If you don't engage and continue to dodge the questions with clichéd anti-climate change and political references, then at best you will be ignored.
