I hope it’s not “done” calibrating itself because even at 250 rmi - it’s 5% degradation in < 12k miles.It seems like your battery recalibrated itself. So a good 20%-90% and then a 100% does indeed seem to recalibrate the battery.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope it’s not “done” calibrating itself because even at 250 rmi - it’s 5% degradation in < 12k miles.It seems like your battery recalibrated itself. So a good 20%-90% and then a 100% does indeed seem to recalibrate the battery.
What is the consensus on a brand new MR - 61-62kWh nominal full? I think you loose 2-3kWh in the beginning regardless, it just happens to be 5% on a smaller battery and 3% on the bigger one. I am also 2.5kWh down, but it is flunctuating between 2 and 2.5kWh after 15k miles, so I guess this is normal. I have seen some people gaining 3kWh over time, but who knows.I hope it’s not “done” calibrating itself because even at 250 rmi - it’s 5% degradation in < 12k miles.
What is the consensus on a brand new MR - 61-62kWh nominal full?
I hope it’s not “done” calibrating itself
52 cycles is too low. I have 70 according to SMT and I am at below 20k km.
What do you make of me driving almost 6 miles before the first mile came off the rmi display? It's like the SC added that energy to the battery, but the BMS didn't bump the nominal full pack number...Yeah I don’t think 3-4 miles of recovery was what you were hoping for.
What do you make of me driving almost 6 miles before the first mile came off the rmi display? It's like the SC added that energy to the battery, but the BMS didn't bump the nominal full pack number...
You forgot the regen. On my car I have almost 1000kWh regen. That will make it closer to 7014000mi*283Wh/mi = 3692kWh
3692kWh/76kWh/cycle = 52 cycles.
If you somehow count DC energy supposedly added (245Wh/rmi), it would be 55-56cycles but that would be incorrect. You could also estimate AC kWh added and that would be 59 cycles but that would also be incorrect. No idea what the SMT calculation or car calculation is doing.
You forgot the regen. On my car I have almost 1000kWh regen. That will make it closer to 70
. I am also 2.5kWh down, but it is flunctuating between 2 and 2.5kWh after 15k miles, so I guess this is normal.
If anything I expect it to go up with warmer weather, we are between 0-10C now.
It was about 1.6 kWh before the first mi came off. So if you allow ~226 Wh for the actual rmi that ticked off... you get 1.2-1.3 kWh "bonus". I am estimating that as Wh/mi * actual_mi_driven from the automatic "this drive" meter.Maybe. Seems like a bit of a tricky problem to get the number correct. How many Wh had you consumed on the trip meter at that point when the miles clicked down?
Could you please check at what SOC % on screen you go below 4.0V cell value on Scan My Tesla. I am curious about the balancing thing. On an LR I am at 4.0V mid cell voltage at around 75%, but curious what that number is on a MR.It was about 1.6 kWh before the first mi came off. So if you allow ~226 Wh for the actual rmi that ticked off... you get 1.2-1.3 kWh "bonus". I am estimating that as Wh/mi * actual_mi_driven from the automatic "this drive" meter.
SMT showed both Nominal Full Pack and Nominal Remaining as 59.1 kWh for the entire 5.8 mi.
I just missed it today.... I was around 72% at ~3.96 (sitting idle - not driving). I'll keep trying to get it closer....Could you please check at what SOC % on screen you go below 4.0V cell value on Scan My Tesla. I am curious about the balancing thing. On an LR I am at 4.0V mid cell voltage at around 75%, but curious what that number is on a MR.
Displayed miles are not applicable to Math as they are not precision and exact gauges.
Math requires hard numbers, but does not work with algorithms that are used for predictions.