Ed Hart
Member
I am a big fan of Christensen, and I predict he will alter his stance. I offer these comments:
1. Was the first flat panel TV disruptive? They were very expensive. Few people had them. But as cost came down, flat panels took over the market. Only a few tube TV incumbents are still around today (Sony buys from China), so any of the missing players would certainly call the flat panel TV a disruptive technology, right?
2. When Christensen/Bartman did their study, they had not seen the real impact of Tesla. By showing that an EV can be a practical replacement for over 95% of car owner needs, Tesla has shown a cleaner transport future....which in turn has emboldened cities, states and whole nations to consider banning internal combustion vehicles altogether...some bans coming in the next few years. If I was an incumbent car maker, I would consider that future to be highly disruptive?! What do others think??
1. Was the first flat panel TV disruptive? They were very expensive. Few people had them. But as cost came down, flat panels took over the market. Only a few tube TV incumbents are still around today (Sony buys from China), so any of the missing players would certainly call the flat panel TV a disruptive technology, right?
2. When Christensen/Bartman did their study, they had not seen the real impact of Tesla. By showing that an EV can be a practical replacement for over 95% of car owner needs, Tesla has shown a cleaner transport future....which in turn has emboldened cities, states and whole nations to consider banning internal combustion vehicles altogether...some bans coming in the next few years. If I was an incumbent car maker, I would consider that future to be highly disruptive?! What do others think??