I bought the wall connector and had it installed. I expected the mobile charger to stay in my car so that I have an option as destination charging is still not prevalent and the charging infrastructure still needs to develop for mainstream EV adoption. It may not be in the offer document, but the SA was conscientious enough to remind me the 14-50 adaptor no longer came with the UMC, so I went and bought it. Now they are changing the product I thought I had purchased again before delivery and it isn't to make the product better or safer. So my trust in the brand is diminished. I now look at all the other changes (e.g supercharging rates, autoplilot issues) and 'features' we expect like OTA updates that they might decide one day to start charging for... where does it stop?
Unfortunately, no one has been harmed yet, so no one has standing to sue Tesla in small claims court, but that is indeed a good question to be asking. There's a lot of stuff that's not explicitly in the delivery contract. The delivery contract does not promise that these cars will have passenger lumbar support, RADAR, or even heat pumps, FM radio, fog lights, heated seats, rear climate control vents, USB ports, etc. How much could Tesla remove before they can be legitimately accused of misrepresenting the product at the time the contract was signed? I think someone would need to sue them in small claims court for not delivering features that a reasonable person would have expected to be there in order to find out. Tesla's lawyers would no doubt argue that the company is known for changing configurations in the past, sometimes to the advantage of the customer (heat pumps, etc.) and this type of configuration changing should have been expected by any reasonable person ordering a vehicle from the company.
Of course, tweets from Elon Musk are not official communication from the company, and you could legitimately claim that you expected the MC to be included with your vehicle. If your vehicle is delivered next week without it, and you still haven't gotten any official communication stating this fact, then you probably have standing to go after Tesla in small claims for at least the cost of the MC.
Not really. I don't know if you actually are experienced with electrical or not, but there are several residential applications where you don't run a Neutral wire for 220v appliances/electrical circuits. Its not about being penny wise/pound foolish... Any electrician would tell you that. They also would tell you that you can have a Neutral wire ran if you wanted, and they will happily take your money for it.
Its about what is the application you are wiring for, what is required, and location/area codes. Running another conductor wire for a circuit that will never be anything but in a garage for either a EV charger or a welder is just overkill.
The whole point is, if you do it while everything else is being wired, it's just the materials cost. If you realize you need it later on, it's materials plus labor plus the service call. Here in the SF Bay Area, labor costs can easily exceed $125/hour, so the cost to add a neutral after the fact can easily be 3-5 times or more than what it would have cost to just add a temporarily unused neutral in the first place.