Model 3 AWD 0-60

[1.21GW]

I have purchased a dragy and tested my Model 3 AWD a few times and I'm amazed with the consistency of performance.

0-60 with 1ft roll out is 4.00s-4.05s after repeated runs. Most cars rated at 4.0s would be difficult to launch and get consistent results. Bracket racing will be extremely easy and potentially boring in the age of EVs.

Has anyone been below 4.00s with the AWD model?

 

[Swampgator]

Someone posted a 3.99 I think but yes the cars are all pretty much the same, and very consistent.
I'm betting we get a potential performance increase later this year.

 

[TyH2009]

I got 4.03 with my Dragy w/ 1 ft rollout, 4.28 without.

This was at 80% SoC.

 

[MagnusMako]

With 1' rollout, I have hit below 4 a few times. 3.94 being my best.

 

[TyH2009]

With 1' rollout, I have hit below 4 a few times. 3.94 being my best.

What was your SoC?

 

[MagnusMako]

What was your SoC?

I'm going to say somewhere between 85-92%. I usually got under 4 after the 3rd or 4th pass.

 

[1.21GW]

With 1' rollout, I have hit below 4 a few times. 3.94 being my best.

Nice work, I’ll have to try at a higher SoC.

 

[Cintoman]

Has anyone tried 0-60 with the latest 5% power upgrade in the new 32.2 software? I think with the previous 5% power update, people were getting 4.0 flat times. Curious if it's gotten better.

--Cintoman

 

[TyH2009]

Has anyone tried 0-60 with the latest 5% power upgrade in the new 32.2 software? I think with the previous 5% power update, people were getting 4.0 flat times. Curious if it's gotten better.

--Cintoman

I plan to as soon as I get a chance at 80% power like i did before with my Dragy before the update.

 

[jebinc]

There is a verified 3.86s run posted on somewhere on TMC. Would love to see more post 36.2.1 verified times. I think it’s safe to say our LR AWD’s are sub 4s cars now.

 

[TyH2009]

Well, not the best runs,

1st run - 83% SOC, only had been driving about 7 minutes prior to the run, 50 degrees outside.

2nd run - 78% SOC, had been driving 15 minutes beforehand, 50 degrees out, but invalid run because too much negative slope

 

[jebinc]

Well, not the best runs,

1st run - 83% SOC, only had been driving about 7 minutes prior to the run, 50 degrees outside.

View attachment 478026


2nd run - 78% SOC, had been driving 15 minutes beforehand, 50 degrees out, but invalid run because too much negative slope

View attachment 478028

4%+ downward slope...

 

[DFW_M3]

Can anyone tell me what the LR AWD horsepower and torque is after the most recent 5% performance upgrade?

 

[bryanbruin]

Can anyone tell me what the LR AWD horsepower and torque is after the most recent 5% performance upgrade?

I think HP is in the 440s. Not sure about torque.

 

[CitiesSprinter]

My best on my LRAWD (non-P) so far was a 4.27 verified 0-60 total, or same run = 3.97 with 1-ft rollout) prior to the upgrade with 81% SoC via my Dragy.. I need to try this again now that I am on .36..

 

[jebinc]

My best so far was a 4.27 verified 0-60 total, or same run = 3.97 with 1-ft rollout) prior to the upgrade with 81% SoC via my Dragy.. I need to try this again now that I am on .36..

And you're driving a LR AWD?

 

[CitiesSprinter]

And you're driving a LR AWD?

Yes. Updated my post to reflect that. =)

 

[MagnusMako]

Can anyone tell me what the LR AWD horsepower and torque is after the most recent 5% performance upgrade?

Per this thread which points to this reddit thread in which a user named Wugz does some CAN bus testing, the LR AWD is now sitting around 447 brake/battery horsepower (meaning before ~4% drive-train losses) after the 2019.36.2.1 update. Peak torque went up about 1%. Peak power about 7.5%.

I've also managed a few more runs and got both a 3.87 and 3.88 with 1 ft rollout. SoC around 93%.

 

[CitiesSprinter]

Hmm. 447 bhp seems like a lot for a standard non-P LR AWD by any measure. I think I'd be fairly happy with that, but the preliminary 0-60 stats with 2019.36 that I'm getting are nowhere near reflecting that level of power.

Turning the clock back a bit, 367 bhp at the wheels seems to be what others are getting for a good baseline (pre 5% bumps) for a non-P LR AWD.

Compare below vs. an old dyno run here for a LRAWD vs. P3D: (This is likely the link that the reddit discussion is referring to.).

 

[Swampgator]

Hmm. 447 bhp seems like a lot for a standard non-P LR AWD by any measure. I think I'd be fairly happy with that, but the preliminary 0-60 stats with 2019.36 that I'm getting are nowhere near reflecting that level of power.

Turning the clock back a bit, 367 bhp at the wheels seems to be what others are getting for a good baseline (pre 5% bumps) for a non-P LR AWD.

Compare below vs. an old dyno run here for a LRAWD vs. P3D: (This is likely the link that the reddit discussion is referring to.).

450 bhp for 4100 lb car translates to roughly 4 sec (without rollout) note: select dual clutch fro transmission

0-60 mph Calculator for Cars | Calculate Estimated 0-60 Times