I know the Model 3 will be 20% smaller on the exterior than the Model S, putting it in the 3-series category. But it will also be using more steel and less aluminum than the S. How much do you think the 3 will end up weighing?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmm seems like we are getting somewhere in the low 4,000 lbs...I think folks are going to pick the middle of the road weight in the poll despite what the numbers are.
Hmm seems like we are getting somewhere in the low 4,000 lbs...
One reason I'm curious is because of range. We know the Chevy Bolt weighs just 3600 lbs or so but has a cd of 0.32 albeit with a smaller front area. With those two factors and smallish wheels, it gets about 4 miles per kWh or about 30% more than the Model S P100D. Since Model 3 will have a lower cd but bigger frontal area and larger wheels, I think weight might also play a part in its ultimate efficiency. With a max battery of 75 kWh, it could have a 300 mile range if it had roughly the same efficiency as the Bolt.
I thought they just said 20% smaller in terms of volume...Elon or JB have already said on one of the earnings calls last year that the M3 will weigh 20% less than MS.
So, let's take a M3 75D and compare this to a MS 75D.
MS weighs in around 4650 # so 80% of that gives us 3720 # so that's my final answer
Also, that car will likely have 500 hp and do 0-60 in about 4 seconds flat.
I have long thought the P75D will have close to 600 hp and that gives us around 3.2 secs 0-60
I love your post.I thought they just said 20% smaller in terms of volume...
If the M3 ends up weighing 20% less and it's cd is 12.5% lower and it's frontal area is also lower, wouldn't that suggest an increase in efficiency greater than 30%? That would put it within striking distance of the S 100D's 335 miles - at 75 kWh, the M3 would have a range of 324 miles (1.3*249).
I thought they just said 20% smaller in terms of volume...
If the M3 ends up weighing 20% less and it's cd is 12.5% lower and it's frontal area is also lower, wouldn't that suggest an increase in efficiency greater than 30%?
Good to know. I would hope the top range M3 breaks 300 miles...No. These efficiencies don't add to each other. You have to take their weighted average. So 20% lower drag, 20% lower rolling resistance (implying ~20% less mass) and 20% lower auxiliary loads will net you a 20% increase in efficiency, not a 60% increase.
I'm certainly going to get 300 miles per charge as I go to and from work - downhill both ways.Good to know. I would hope the top range M3 breaks 300 miles...
haha yeah - I do hope the 75D breaks 300 and that this version is offered at launch. I'm also still hoping Elon surprises us and maybe starts shipping the D or P versions sooner than the end of next year.I'm certainly going to get 300 miles per charge as I go to and from work - downhill both ways.
I would be happy if it's under 4,000 for energy efficiency purposes, but I'm not expecting it to weigh that much less than the S.
It'll be less than the S.
I'm guessing the lightest 3 will be around 3,800 lbs, the heaviest around 4,300 lbs.
... Since Model 3 will have a lower cd but bigger frontal area... .
Ok?
Idk. We'll see.
Why in the world would it be heavier? There's no way. First of all, it's a physically smaller car, with smaller-capacity battery packs. Yes, supposedly it will have more steel than that Model S, but I'm confident it won't be heavier than the S.
Why in the world would it be heavier? There's no way. First of all, it's a physically smaller car, with smaller-capacity battery packs. Yes, supposedly it will have more steel than that Model S, but I'm confident it won't be heavier than the S.