You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
5% strikes me as too much of a difference between 32 and 48 AmpsI think the max 240V setup with 48A would be close to 95%, but 32A isn't that much worse, maybe 91% or so to my recollection.
After 1 year with the Model 3 Standard Plus (55KWh), I spent 3285 KWh in charge, while only 2688 KWh was delivered (and then available) by the battery. It represents a 18% loss.
Charging most of time at 240V, 3x5A. Rarely 3x16A or superchargers.
Up to now, I was thinking that a lower power would result in better efficiency. What does represent this constant overhead at 0.3 kW? Is it linked to AC-DC conversion ? Battery heating?
You meanNet Energy = (Volts x Amps x 0.94) - 300
Sounds about rightSo that's 10.9kwh to charge the battery 8.5kwh. In other words, only 77.9% of the power went to charging the battery.
After 1 year with the Model 3 Standard Plus (55KWh), I spent 3285 KWh in charge, while only 2688 KWh was delivered (and then available) by the battery. It represents a 18% loss.
Charging most of time at 240V, 3x5A. Rarely 3x16A or superchargers.
Up to now, I was thinking that a lower power would result in better efficiency. What does represent this constant overhead at 0.3 kW? Is it linked to AC-DC conversion ? Battery heating?
The provider pays the conversion costs