An analyst predicts steel construction for the Model 3 (see article here). This would make sense from a cost perspective (as my Mercedes engineering buddies say, "if you're familiar with the material properties, you pick steel!") - but I would think (plus other factors) this will mean a new body shop:
1. Welding is different - welding aluminum is a heliarc process, whereas with steel, it is a steel pulse weld, or something similar.
2. High volumes for Model 3 makes for a much shorter TAKT time, i.e.m,much faster cycles for Model 3 body in white.
3. Trying to mix the two in a single body shop would be extremely tough.
Paint may also be different - I would think that your chemistry for washing the body (prior to plating step) would be different, as would the undercoat plating as well.
Then there is the matter of assembly - Model 3 will have to have less hand labor content than MS to have any chance of ever becoming profitable.
Does this sound right? Practically an entirely new plant for the Model 3? (Fremont certainly has the space for it....)
1. Welding is different - welding aluminum is a heliarc process, whereas with steel, it is a steel pulse weld, or something similar.
2. High volumes for Model 3 makes for a much shorter TAKT time, i.e.m,much faster cycles for Model 3 body in white.
3. Trying to mix the two in a single body shop would be extremely tough.
Paint may also be different - I would think that your chemistry for washing the body (prior to plating step) would be different, as would the undercoat plating as well.
Then there is the matter of assembly - Model 3 will have to have less hand labor content than MS to have any chance of ever becoming profitable.
Does this sound right? Practically an entirely new plant for the Model 3? (Fremont certainly has the space for it....)