Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

omgwtfbyobbq

Active Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,450
1,661
Southern California
Since it's fun to speculate, I threw together a little python script that uses the EPA FTP-75/HWFET traces and the unadjusted EPA rating of the S 70D to guess at Model 3 range. Using an admittedly crude comparison, I'm guesstimating a 55kWh 3 will hit 240+ mile combined and 75kWh 3 will hit 325+ miles combined with a .21 Cd. A .24 Cd hits 220+ miles for the 55 and 300+ miles for the 75.

Here's a link to my script. I appreciate any suggestions and constructive criticisms.

Model3.py

In terms of the nuts and bolts, I assumed the 3 would be 71" wide and 55" tall with a drag coefficient of .21/.24. The estimated dimensions are from the Model 3 dimensions thread on this forum. The 55s weight is estimated to be 1815kg with a driver and the 75 weighs 1905kg with a driver. That estimate is assuming a 20% smaller vehicle with a little more steel, which I adjusted for by comparing the curb weights of the last gen high strength steel F150 to the current Al bodied F150, and the increase in battery weight is form the current differences in the weight of a 70D/90D. The Crr is .0089, which is from a 2014 Tesla blog post on the Roadster 3.0. The S 70D specs I found on the interweboftubes.

Long story short, the script grabs the EPA trace files from the site, and for each data file, loops through each entry and sums the power required to overcome aero and rolling drag for each car. The range estimate is pretty straightforward. It's just the product of the ratio of S 70D power to Model 3 XXkWh power, the ratio of battery capacities, and the 70D 5-cycle range.

This I think provides a good physical ballpark, but like most things could be improved. One of the assumptions I made is that the 3's baseline power consumption would scale with the car's size compared to the S, but that might not be accurate. I've seen 50W used for the roadster, so if someone could dig up the figure for the S 70D, they could use that to get an accurate idea of what lesser (or no) improvements to that figure would do to range. Someone who is better versed with Al/HSS vehicle construction could probably come up with more accurate weight/area estimates.

The EPA only publishes the Wh/mile figures for the FTP75/HWFET tests, so if we could get the S 70D's figures for the other 3 tests as well as the method used to derive the adjusted 5-cycle range from all 5 tests, that would help out a bunch. There's also the trade-off between motor gearing/efficiency and 0-60 times, which I think the current 90D takes advantage of to get better highway range than the 70D, even though it weighs a few hundred pounds more.

Nailing down all those relationships would I think provide a nice view of how the Model 3 will perform.
 

geoffreak

Driving My Model 3
Dec 1, 2015
393
526
Dallas, TX
Here's a version of the script viewable online.

Your calculations seem to line up with Elon's statement of at least 215 miles. I don't think he would have said at least 215 unless he thought there was a high possibility of surpassing that by a significant amount. 240 miles seems to be right around this window.

I want to see what you get for a few different battery sizes (± 5-10 kWh).
 

SageBrush

REJECT Fascism
May 7, 2015
12,552
16,581
New Mexico
VERY spiffy!

I don't have any experience with python, but I tried anyway ...
I downloaded the script and tried to run it in a free python editor available for the Chromebook.
It seemed to load OK but running the script caused this error

Screenshot 2016-05-07 at 3.56.32 PM.png
 

Johan

Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!
Feb 9, 2012
7,496
9,893
Drammen, Norway
Tires. A lot can be done with tires and wheel dimensions. The Model 3 isn't Model S or X so it won't come with those kinds of big wheels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SageBrush

Jeff N

Active Member
Oct 31, 2011
2,460
3,547
Not that I think it will make a huge difference, but it's worth remembering that Elon did not claim that the Model 3 Cd is .21. He said that they were trying for .21 but implied that they weren't quite there yet and were still tweaking the design with .21 as a target.
 

Jayc

Member
Mar 28, 2016
599
554
UK
Tires. A lot can be done with tires and wheel dimensions. The Model 3 isn't Model S or X so it won't come with those kinds of big wheels.

Don't know whether that is a valid statement in this context where tyre grip matters for performance, we may be a bit constrained.
 

SageBrush

REJECT Fascism
May 7, 2015
12,552
16,581
New Mexico
Roadster 3.0 is spec'd with 0.0089 kg/ton CRR tyres. I think we can consider that a conservative upper bound. Honestly though, it just seems common sense to offer a fuel economy choice and a 'beat the other car to the next red light' choice.
 

Topher

Energy Curmudgeon
Apr 7, 2016
1,406
1,285
Maine
Not that I think it will make a huge difference, but it's worth remembering that Elon did not claim that the Model 3 Cd is .21. He said that they were trying for .21 but implied that they weren't quite there yet and were still tweaking the design with .21 as a target.

If they are at the level of tweaking 0.1mm, they are nearer 0.22 (in a quest for 0.21) than 0.24. IMHO.

Thank you kindly.
 

omgwtfbyobbq

Active Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,450
1,661
Southern California
  • Like
Reactions: SageBrush

jeffhre

Member
Apr 23, 2008
105
11
Antelope Valley, CA
"The 55s weight is estimated to be 1815kg with a driver and the 75 weighs 1905kg with a driver..."

The 55s weight is estimated to be 1815kg (without) a driver and the 75 weighs 1905kg with a driver.
 

omgwtfbyobbq

Active Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,450
1,661
Southern California
According to the Motor Trend estimates the 55D will weight 1973kg without the driver and have a frontal area that's ~1.075 times my estimate (74.2" x 56.5" instead of 71" x 55"). On the flip side, if Jeff's right, Cd is likely .21-.22, which sounds right. Feel free to plug and chug to check what the different numbers do to range.
 
Last edited:

omgwtfbyobbq

Active Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,450
1,661
Southern California
Haha, autocorrect for the win, or lose. The Motor Trend weight figures are kind of weird though. Using their estimate for the 75D, the curb weight + driver is ~2150kg, which is within 3% of a Model S 70D. Granted, an extra ~20+kg is from the extra 5kWh of batteries, but that still seems a bit high.

I think they're using the Model 3 width with mirrors out, which I shouldn't use for the CdA calculation. If they are using the mirrors out width, then the actual area should be just a hair above my estimate, or maybe the same since without the mirrors their estimate could be a inch thinner even if it's also an inch taller
 

Products we're discussing on TMC...

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top