You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the mirrors are still the widest point of the car after being folded, it's possible that the width is still slightly exaggerated in the specs. Would have to get access to an actual car to confirm.
Yeah, so excluding mirrors, it could be narrower than 72.8" when mirrors are folded.The Model 3 mirrors kind of swivel instead of pivoting. They don't look like they take much width off.
Yep, kind defeats the purpose of folding mirrors, but it still knocks ~6" off the total width so 3" per side is better than nothing for squeezing into tight spaces.Well, that's even worse, isn't it? You still can't squeeze into a narrow garage/lane/parking spot, but you also don't get the advantage of the greater elbow room that would result if the actual car were wider.
Wow, what a great picture!I'm pretty sure the folded mirrors won't be the widest part of the car. The setup is pretty similar to the S and the car is definitely widest at the wheel wells.
Right. But the smaller size was my main reason for waiting for Model 3 - I want an electric car much smaller than Model S. If it's only an inch narrower, and a foot shorter, Model 3 hardly seems worth the wait, particularly as the cost difference seems to keep narrowing.
So maybe I want a Model S after all. Have to reconsider.
Right. But the smaller size was my main reason for waiting for Model 3 -
I want an electric car much smaller than Model S.
If it's only an inch narrower, and a foot shorter, Model 3 hardly seems worth the wait,
particularly as the cost difference seems to keep narrowing.
So maybe I want a Model S after all. Have to reconsider.
I wish Tesla consider making a smaller urban car, easy to park, "Model 2" about the size of an i3/Bolt/Golf even if the price would be similar to the Model 3.
Agreed, I'd even pay more for a smaller car. Note that the Model 3 is significantly wider than your chart indicates - it's actually 76.1" with mirrors folded. As noted earlier in this thread, there was apparently an error by Tesla communicating the width.
Thank you, I updated the chart.Agreed, I'd even pay more for a smaller car. Note that the Model 3 is significantly wider than your chart indicates - it's actually 76.1" with mirrors folded. As noted earlier in this thread, there was apparently an error by Tesla communicating the width.
Yes, bulky cars are a nuisance unless you actually need the space. Small cars are more fun to drive, easier to park, easier to merge.
I'm hoping Model Y will be the one with a much smaller footprint. But that's still a long way off. As of now, even with M3, the only cars available from Tesla are wide and bulky.
Wow, what a great picture!
It's a bit hard to tell since the perspective skews it a bit, but it looks to me that it's possible that the mirror may still be the widest part of the car even when folded.
Too bad they don't sell the Renault Zoe over here, sounds like that's your car.
Yes, bulky cars are a nuisance unless you actually need the space. Small cars are more fun to drive, easier to park, easier to merge.
I'm hoping Model Y will be the one with a much smaller footprint. But that's still a long way off. As of now, even with M3, the only cars available from Tesla are wide and bulky.
I'm hoping Model Y will be the one with a much smaller footprint.