At least with regards to my driving style, regenerative braking tends to "brake" far more aggressive than I would if I were manually applying the brakes.
That's actually high for the Roadster AD07 rear tires (I assume that's what he has). Most people get 5-8 thousand miles on the rears and driving style does play a big role but they are very soft tires and will wear quickly with normal driving as well. The fronts on the Roadster probably last 3 times as long. I'd expect something similar for the Model S but not as bad, maybe over 10,000 for the 21" wheels and much more for the 19" wheels.
Maybe someone can shed some light on this topic for me because I'm getting a little confused.
How is it that regenerative braking is adding extra wear to the tire? Is this a myth of some sort?
I always thought regen braking was gradually applying friction and converting to energy process that would ease the car to a slower speed. Unless the regen braking was so aggressive that it causes the tires to squeal to a slower speed it doesn't seem like regen braking should cause extra tire wear. Performance tires wear extra quick. All season tires do not.