You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok help me out a little. I'm comparing pictures of the regular interior to the signature interior.
What is the difference between perforated leather in the regular vs. the nappa leather in the signature?
Other than the different kind of leather (perforated vs. nappa), is the only difference the piping on the trim of the seats?
Where is all the "extra" leather that supposedly comes with the Signature series?
Maybe my eye isn't as discerning so help me out. I'm still trying to decide whether to stick with a Sig or go with a regular.
Ok help me out a little. I'm comparing pictures of the regular interior to the signature interior.
What is the difference between perforated leather in the regular vs. the nappa leather in the signature?
Other than the different kind of leather (perforated vs. nappa), is the only difference the piping on the trim of the seats?
Where is all the "extra" leather that supposedly comes with the Signature series?
Maybe my eye isn't as discerning so help me out. I'm still trying to decide whether to stick with a Sig or go with a regular.
I was confused as well. Here is what Tesla told me.
The non-sig cars will have a leather-like material on the dash/doors/etc. The difference will only be noticeable on close inspection.
Also aren't the Performance versions supposed to have carbon fiber on the exterior as well in some places? From the pictures provided, I can't really see where that is.
The CF is subtle but on the top of the grille, bottom of front bumper and a few other places.
Thanks for that blown up picture NigelM!
I guess that really is subtle. I'm not sure the the presence or absence of CF exterior is going to make much difference to me.
It goes really well with those smoky performance wheels
Thanks. I'm looking at the regular cloth interior picture AnOutsider posted earlier and comparing it to the Sig Performance picture, and there isn't a lot of difference that I can tell.
Thanks. I'm looking at the regular cloth interior picture AnOutsider posted earlier and comparing it to the Sig Performance picture, and there isn't a lot of difference that I can tell.
Are you seriously using rendered pictures an accurate way to compare the quality and look of materials? These would need to be seen and compared.
I only saw he was comparing pictures, not making decisions about quality and look of materials. Surely that discussion is allowed?