TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Model S refresh with bigger side repeater housing

Discussion in 'Autopilot & Autonomous/FSD' started by diplomat33, Feb 22, 2021.

  1. diplomat33

    diplomat33 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN USA
    • Informative x 2
  2. dckiwi

    dckiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    This could be related to the challenges that FSD Beta has had in 'seeing' cross traffic at a distance when making turns.

    If this is indeed a new sensor, they are going to have to retrofit a TON of Model 3s and Ys that have been shipping over the last few quarters. Every day that goes by without the 'right' sensor suite in place for FSD is another long line of retrofits.

    EDIT: I also wonder how much of the FSD code has to be rewritten (or neural net retrained) when sensors are moved/added? Does all the labeling data go out the window? Presumably it changes the way the images are stitched together to create a full picture of what is happening around the car. Hopefully this is abstracted out at a very low level.
     
  3. diplomat33

    diplomat33 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN USA
    If there is a second camera in the housing pointing outward 90 degrees that would help to see cross traffic. But if it is still a standard housing with just a side repeater camera pointing backwards, that would not help with cross traffic.
     
    • Like x 1
  4. RTPEV

    RTPEV Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2016
    Messages:
    804
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    This is certainly a huge speculation, but what about creating a slightly wider frame of view to be used as an alternative for side mirrors in the future?
     
    • Like x 2
  5. diplomat33

    diplomat33 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN USA
    Yes, that is a possibility. AFAIK, regulators still require side mirrors but the idea has been discussed to some day completely replace side mirrors with side repeater cameras.
     
  6. DanCar

    DanCar Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,670
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    As long as Tesla delivers on whatever promises were made with current sensor suite, no retrofit is required. Just because there are improvements doesn't mean Tesla has to retrofit.
     
    • Like x 1
  7. dckiwi

    dckiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    Very true. So they just have to deliver on full robotaxi with current sensor suite :)
     
    • Like x 1
    • Disagree x 1
    • Funny x 1
  8. serendipitous

    serendipitous Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2019
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Really? Is that what your contract said when you signed it and paid for FSD?
     
    • Like x 1
  9. dckiwi

    dckiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    Yes. The "Tesla Network" page even warned buyers that we could use our cars for paid ridesharing, but couldn't use it to transport friends and family. They promised *a lot*.
     
    • Disagree x 2
    • Like x 1
  10. DanCar

    DanCar Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,670
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    If you could post a copy of your contract, I'm interested.
     
    • Like x 2
  11. VT_EE

    VT_EE Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2017
    Messages:
    2,016
    Location:
    Maryland
    All contingent upon approval by regulators. If the system doesn’t get approved, they have an out clause.
     
  12. DanCar

    DanCar Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,670
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    No approval required in several jurisdictions like Arizona, Florida, I've heard Texas included also.
     
    • Like x 1
  13. dckiwi

    dckiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    Are you referring to the Order Agreement that we all sign when we purchase a Tesla? I'm sure you have a copy. It says nothing about FSD beyond the fact that I purchased 'Full Self Driving Capability'.

    It also says nothing about how the Falcon Wing Doors or the navigation system works either. Does that mean Tesla has no obligation to ensure their functionality works as advertised?

    All the unmet promises about FSD were in marketing content posted to their Web site. If you're saying that any commitments made outside the contract are meaningless, then why even deliver any FSD capabilities to customers who have purchased it?
     
    • Like x 3
  14. Hayseed_MS

    Hayseed_MS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2021
    Messages:
    203
    Location:
    Midwest
    The rear fender flares out slightly more on the refresh and this could also be reason for the larger repeater?
     
    • Like x 4
  15. serendipitous

    serendipitous Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2019
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Exactly.
     
    • Like x 1
  16. dckiwi

    dckiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    So then what functionality *is* Tesla obligated to deliver to customers who have purchased it? Anything? Because by your standard, the Order Agreement has zero details about what FSD is.
     
    • Like x 2
    • Disagree x 1
  17. DanCar

    DanCar Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,670
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    To honestly answer that question, a lawsuit would need to be filed and a judge would need to render his opinion.
    Since there hasn't been much with dates, I suspect Tesla will just say: we are working on it, even if it is 2030. Although a judge could say there is a reasonable expectation that it gets done within a certain time frame.
     
    • Like x 1
  18. dckiwi

    dckiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    Right, back to my original point - Tesla would be in a sticky situation if they DID start delivering significant FSD functionality only to newer cars with a newer sensor suite.
     
    • Like x 1
    • Disagree x 1
  19. serendipitous

    serendipitous Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2019
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    What you actually ordered just says "Autosteer on city streets" - which, at the moment, they seem happy to define as a level 2 feature. I'm sure they will exceed that in terms of what they give us early adopters, but I doubt they feel any obligation to perpetually provide any hardware features required to deal with an as-yet-unsolved-at-any-price problem in computational AI.
     
  20. dckiwi

    dckiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    My contract says nothing about 'Autosteer on city streets' either - what makes you say that this is what I ordered, and not something else? ;)

    Unless you're just referring to what was on the Tesla web site at the time I ordered, which you have already dismissed because it is just 'marketing'.
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC