TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Model X has single 72A charger

Discussion in 'Model X: Battery & Charging' started by ohmman, Aug 3, 2015.

  1. ohmman

    ohmman Maximum Plaid Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    Messages:
    4,779
    Location:
    North Bay, CA
    Today, I received information from a Tesla source that there will be a single charger offered on the X, and that it will be a 60A charger instead of 40A. I was told that this was in part due to the fact that getting a charger in the back of the vehicle was difficult due to the 3rd row seating. I'm assuming it is also a nice compromise between 40A and 80A.

    Just a rumor, but I have reason to believe this is valid information.
     
  2. SW2Fiddler

    SW2Fiddler Bannd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,689
    Location:
    Houston TX
    Not the craziest thing I've heard.
    I was wondering when the charger specs would improve, and by how much.
     
  3. NigelM

    NigelM Recovering Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2011
    Messages:
    13,257
    Location:
    Sarasota, FL
    On-board chargers are rated in kW not amps. The Model S charger is 10kW and can accept a current up to 40A; 20kW capable twin chargers double the capacity I.e. Can handle up to 80A at the correct voltage and frequency. While it's quite possible that Tesla has come up with a single charger that has increased capacity above the current 10kW spec, it would also be very unusual for anyone at Tesla to refer to them by amps and not kW.
     
  4. ohmman

    ohmman Maximum Plaid Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    Messages:
    4,779
    Location:
    North Bay, CA
    This is a fair point. In the defense of the source, he was discussing it in terms of my HPWC, which I'd mentioned I used at 80A. And I can guarantee it was someone at Tesla.. not sure if you're implying otherwise but I'm not interested in starting an unfounded rumor.. :smile:
     
  5. aesculus

    aesculus Still Trying to Figure this All Out

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    1,953
    Location:
    Northern California
    Why would I want to compromise from 80 amps? There is nothing that states I have to charge at that high a current, but when needed, I want the fastest charge possible.
     
  6. goneskiian

    goneskiian Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,986
    Location:
    Bellevue WA
    +1 ;-)
     
  7. NigelM

    NigelM Recovering Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2011
    Messages:
    13,257
    Location:
    Sarasota, FL
    I take your word for it. I talked last week to a group of 3 Tesla sales guys I know, they told me stuff has been kept top secret and they literally had nothing to share even if they wanted to; there are, of course, internal rumors here and there but funnily enough they did indicate that the most interesting rumors were to be found on TMC.

    Bearing in mind an increased battery size, slower charging (vs MS spec twin chargers) on all those destination HPWCs doesn't sound too attractive. Perhaps I'm an exception but I really like the relatively fast charge I can get via my HPWC on a 100A circuit in my own garage.
     
  8. ohmman

    ohmman Maximum Plaid Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    Messages:
    4,779
    Location:
    North Bay, CA
    I agree as well. I have dual chargers on my MS and would prefer the capacity.
     
  9. pmadflyer

    pmadflyer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    Shawnee, KS
    Maybe that's just single charger and the second brings it up to 120 amps. Get your 150 amp breakers, and 1 awg THHN copper wire.
     
  10. Lyon

    Lyon 2016 S P100DL, 2016 X P90D

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,988
    Location:
    Eugene, Oregon
    Seems very un-Tesla if you ask me. I mean, aren't they all about overcoming these technical hurdles? Also, it doesn't make much sense: it's too much for a NEMA 14-50 and not enough to make the high power connector worth the extra cost.
     
  11. Paul Carter

    Paul Carter Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,456
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Its not going to be a surprise for sure. I believe several people have stated here before not to buy the HPWC in preparation for the Model X as it may be different.
     
  12. SW2Fiddler

    SW2Fiddler Bannd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,689
    Location:
    Houston TX
    Indeed.
    I was envisioning a next-gen single charger for the X and S would be 20kW capable and possibly 22. To really dial the future-proofing to 11, LOL
     
  13. ratsbew

    ratsbew Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2012
    Messages:
    371
    Assuming that the new charger is 15kW, that would mean 6 hours to charge a 90kWh battery from 0-100% or 7 hours if we get the speculated 110kWh battery. That's should still cover 100% of daily usage scenarios. The biggest negative that I can see is slow destination charging. Assuming that Model X has a higher power consumption per mile, then the slower charge rate is compounded by less efficiency to reduce the miles per hour of charge that can be attained.
     
  14. AnxietyRanger

    AnxietyRanger Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    2,226
    Location:
    EU
    I have no idea if this is accurate. I guess most of us would hope it is not, if revised chargers really would only reach 75% of current performance. But our (or even Tesla's) wishes may not always be the deciding factor if technical realities dictate otherwise.

    I guess the only notion I can offer is that few of the anonymous or otherwise sources (or alleged sources) on TMC have referred to Tesla starting Model X training. If so, I guess it is at least possible more than select people at Tesla having heard such details.

    Anyway, I agree such a decrease in home charging potential seems unlikely and I hope there is some other explanation for this rumor.
     
  15. fischca

    fischca Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    38
    Location:
    Duelmen, Germany
    The performance of the onboard charger need to be upgraded with a growing capacity of the battery.
    In my country we have a good reserve for AC-Charging: I can use up to 43kW AC-Power via my standard three-phase-grid at home. We have 63 Ampere on three phases and the Mennekes-charging connector can handle this charging rate.
    I hope for an upgrade of the onboard-charger from 32A to 40-50A for three-phases-charging =>no problem to charge a 120-150 kWh-battery overnight.
     
  16. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    2,536
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    With bigger batteries, the need for faster charging *decreases*.

    I've already installed a 16A 230V (3.6 kW) socket in my garage for the Model X, because I really don't need more than that. The battery easily covers a week worth of driving, and if I return from a long trip with an empty battery, 8 hours of charging replenishes more than enough range for the following day.

    On the other hand, if I had a Leaf or something similar, I would find myself in situations where I would return home from a trip in the middle of the day with close to zero range, and then need 100 km a couple of hours later in the evening. Then I'd need ~10 kW charging, so that I could make that evening trip. (Without using a rapid charger.) The Model X covers that use case with no additional charging.

    I think the rumor could be accurate, though. I've been suspecting the charger could be getting an upgrade, after the dual charger stopped being available in the design studio. It's apparent the dual charger isn't something Tesla wants to sell, so they are likely to replace it with something better.
     
  17. tom66

    tom66 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2013
    Messages:
    622
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    This would actually make sense as photos have been taken of a Gen2 charger which is used by Tesla in the latest supercharger systems. This has a 45A battery output vs 30A. However that is only 48A input from 3ph. Maybe 60A over 1ph?

    attachment.php?attachmentid=85960&d=1435797960.jpg

    Would not be surprised if Tesla do this for Model S, too.
     
  18. AnxietyRanger

    AnxietyRanger Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    2,226
    Location:
    EU
    I am no electrician so a genuine question: Could an upgraded "60A" (to use the term of the thread) single charger be more likely to allow better three-phase Mennekes charging than the current dual setup? Or could either do it but just currently aren't specced up to it for other reasons?

    Because that would certainly help in Europe.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Good point. Thank you.

    - - - Updated - - -

    A good post. And a related-to-thread image too. :) This conversation is washing away many a disappointments.
     
  19. Matteo

    Matteo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2015
    Messages:
    167
    Location:
    EU
    No, it's not unusual. Tesla's website refers to them as 40A and 80A in some places.
    Source: Tesla Charging | Tesla Motors
    1kslAs0.gif
     
  20. NigelM

    NigelM Recovering Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2011
    Messages:
    13,257
    Location:
    Sarasota, FL
    That not a reference to to the chargers but to the maximum incoming amps as part of the calculation. Take a look at the specs, or just about everywhere else and you'll see them correctly as kW. I'm not saying this development is impossible, just that it is an unusual way to refer to it.

    - - - Updated - - -

    6 or 7 hours of charging at home is unacceptably long. With two Tesla's in our garage I stagger the charge start times for conservative safety reasons;; it becomes very difficult, if not impossible, to do this if the X is going to take up so much charge time.

    Like many other folks I've wired my garaged with 50A 14-50s and a 100A HPWC. It would be crazy if Tesla now changed to something different that can't optimize usage of existing set-ups.
     

Share This Page