The X solves one huge problem: ingress and egress for passengers, whether they are 1 yo or 70 yo. It simplifies this even in tight spaces...
I get what you mean, but I don't agree. Here's how I would put it: the Model X adds some passenger ingress/egress benefits in some scenarios, while introducing a host of issues in other scenarios, including issues in some passenger ingress/egress situations. For the 70 year olds, the lack of door to support them while getting out is one issue, let alone if the doors can't fully open and you have to duck.
The thing is, aside from appearance or "image", pretty much everything the Model X falcon wings solved, could be solved with a sliding door better. The great promise of the falcon wings, improved third row access, never materialized since the production car shipped with smaller falcon wings than prototype and third-row entry still needs seat moving.
So the only thing that clearly did materialize is second-row side seat access being improved, which helps with the child seats, assuming your parking area is such that they can open enough in this scenario.
Really how many are being "forced" to modify their garages? Charging infrastructure being the exception. I haven't seen any door not being able to open issue. How widespread is this really?
There are many cases of people moving their garage door openers on TMC to accommodate the Model X. And of course there are several people whose doors still have hit some bar somewhere or, changing from software update to update, whose doors refuse to open beyond some imagined obstacle. There are many threads about this.
With regular doors, you can manually control them to open just so in many cases, but with automated, two-hinge doors you can't control them with such finesse.
I'll just add my own. I park outside and there are (usually) no cars or obstacles next to my Model X, so theoretically there should be no reason for my falcon wings to not open. Yet even in my relatively short ownership and new car (2017 built), there have already been several instances when the doors decide there is impending doom right next to my car when there is nothing there.
I don't think the doors are faulty, I have come to the conclusion they do this because they see an obstacle on the driveway earlier and remember passing that obstacle and are being overly cautious since they aren't quite sure if the obstacle is still there. (Ironically, AP2 cars have cameras in that area that are not used to help.) The result, the doors are super slow to open and need to be forced. And they are slower than regular doors even when they work well, so drops/pick-ups are somewhat slower to do in the Model X than they used to be.
There's also the situation when everyone is entering/exiting the car. Unlike with regular doors where the movement range of each door is independent of each other, as is the ingress/egress area for front and back, with falcon wings you have think about what you are doing as there is a sort of disconnect between how the front and rear doors operate. You quite easily enter and exit the front partially from the area where the falcon wing door is moving.
Usually I just stand outside or wait indoors while my rear passengers enter/exit, so as to not get pinched between the doors or risk the doors hitting each other. Similar caution with the trunk opening.
Oh and theres the doors hitting you on the head. Never had such an issue with regular doors, but I've already hit my head on the falcon wings a few times.
Simply put, with falcon wings, there seems to be always a little bit more hassle... and this is the part that I think is an obstacle in Model X adoption. Model S so beautifully did what no other recent BEV had, made a normal, versatile car that just happened to be a BEV. It plays on all the strengths of a BEV to just make this better, like increased interior and trunk space. It is not a weirdmobile. Instead of being a great SUV that just happens to be a BEV, Model X is a weirdmobile. Sure, desireable to a niche (perhaps I would not have it without the doors) and there are some positive ideas in the doors for ingress/egress, but in the end a limiting factor for wide appeal.
There is a reason why gullwings and scissor doors, at the end of the day, do not appear in mainstream, volume cars. They are fine for desireable sportsmobiles and bedroom posters, but for everyday use for the masses they are not practical. If they were, we'd seen much more rising doors in cars.
IMO, for the falcon wing concept to be worth all the sacrifices it forces upon us - beyond a halo model thinking (I mean Mercedes didn't put the gull wing doors on the SLS any more than DMC did because where were practical) - it would have to dramatically double down on the passenger ingress/eggress scenario, much more so than it does on the Model X that shipped.
If the falcon wings for example allowed access to the third-row directly without moving the second-row, that would be an obvious benefit for a people carrier. This is an area where they could be superior to the sliding door (since it is harder to slide a door out of the way) and this is why I think in a possible Tesla minibus they might even make sense, if they allow direct access to different rows.
Though even the sliding door concept could evolve, as a I drew and upwards rising and then backwards moving hinge, for some Model Y speculation on TMC... (
Fictional Concept: Sliding "Falcon Wings" for Model Y)