I didn't say that. I just pointed out that you're comparing apples to oranges when you change the vehicle sizes.
Sure my comparisons were imprecise, it was just a quick draft to get the idea on the table, but are they really
that much off to call them apples and oranges? Really?
The amount of imprecision matters. If I'm off so much that "you don't think the Model X hatch is in the same area as the Model S hitch", then I would get your point, but you say that is not what you said.
What does it matter if my drawing is a bit imprecise, if the general idea still makes sense?
p.s. The dictionary reference was obviously a joke, smiley included.
- - - Updated - - -
I hope this helps the dialogue along.
Here is an updated version of my drawing using thirteen percentage points more height for Model X than Model S and aligning their rear left tyres and heights. 13% comes from the Model X prototype vs. Model S, if a quick Google is accurate. Of course there still remains the question of exact Model X beta/production height which we assume is a slight bit more than the prototype, different camera perspectives and car angles, whatever ride-height settings and cargo the mules had etc., but I think this is quite a bit more precise than the previous one which was just a quick draft.
What do you guys think, is the Model S hitch in the same place as the Model X mule hatch?
- - - Updated - - -
By the way, it should be noted that especially the image on the right is taken so low that its perspective isn't quite comparable to the two images on the left, e.g. comparing "spoiler to spoiler" with the white Model X mule. This means in reality, the hatch actually sits lower in comparison. The white Model X and Model S seem more comparable, perspective-wise, although the white one is bending a little.