TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Moonbase Alpha - The Moonbase discussion

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by Grendal, Apr 1, 2018.

  1. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,154
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Robert Zubrin posted an op-ed piece at Space News explaining how to build a Moon base quickly using SpaceX:

    Op-ed | Moon Direct: How to build a moonbase in four years - SpaceNews.com
     
    • Like x 2
  2. AudubonB

    AudubonB Investing is fun!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,405
    As good a location as any to ask the following question, in that its premise is part of the good Zubrin's location argument.

    Q: Why is it that water ice ("accumulated..in permanently shadowed craters") doesn't effectively immediately sublimate in the non-existent lunar atmosphere?
     
  3. croman

    croman Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2016
    Messages:
    4,493
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    The moon does have an atmosphere. Its very thin and virtually useless for the purposes to which we typically ascribe for atmosphere on Earth but its is there.

    Is There an Atmosphere on the Moon?

    EDIT: This article more directly addresses your question:

    Atmosphere of the Moon
     
  4. AudubonB

    AudubonB Investing is fun!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,405
    That's missing my point...
     
  5. croman

    croman Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2016
    Messages:
    4,493
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Ok...The water doesn't sublimate because it is not exposed to sunlight and is adsorbed into rock. Per observation, it might be chemically bound to the rock/dust as part of a hydroxyl group.
     
  6. rabar10

    rabar10 Model 3 >> Focus Electric

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,455
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    If there is actual ice on the moon, why hasn't it sublimated?

    Temperatures in the craters are <100K, so the ice is in fact sublimating, but at an extremely slow rate, so as to be not appreciable.

    Back to the Zubrin article — haven’t done the maths/research yet, but wondering how the total mass-to-surface is in his plan compares to a) the ISS in low-earth-orbit (long-term habitation, but in LEO and assembled via many more trips), and b) mass-to-surface of an Apollo mission (single Saturn V but to lunar surface)...
     
  7. S'toon

    S'toon Knows where his towel is

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,661
    Location:
    AB
    What about Moon Unit Zappa?
     
    • Funny x 1
  8. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    18,847
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    While I appreciate the main message of Zubrin’s article — that the SLS and Deep Space Gateway are fundamentally irrational pieces of hardware and that SpaceX offers transportation services for a tiny fraction of the price — it appears to me that he glosses over the true cost of such a moonbase: developing and building all the necessary hardware that he describes and which currently does not exist. The list is long: various sizes of H2/O2 rocket engines (would have to go to Blue Origin for those), lunar landers with 12 ton payload capacity, solar panel arrays suitable for use on the moon, high-data-rate communications gear for use on the moon, microwave power-beaming set up with a range of 100 kilometers, two crew vehicles for use on the lunar surface, a “trailer”, and a group of tele-operated robotic rovers, 12-ton lunar surface habitation module, Lunar Excursion Vehicle (LEV), electrolysis/refrigeration unit to convert mined water ice to hydrogen and oxygen, and probably other major pieces of hardware that I have missed as well as a large number of smaller pieces of hardware that he does not list.

    It will cost billions to develop and build all that hardware. I’m fine with cancelling SLS and DSG right now and diverting all that money to the project Zubrin proposes, but the reality is that is not going to happen because powerful senators will not allow it

    Regardless, I applaud Zubrin’s proposal and am happy to see him call out the SLS and DSG for the ridiculous waste of money that they are.
     
    • Like x 2
  9. PV-EV

    PV-EV Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    407
    Location:
    Alaska
    I enjoyed reading his book “The case for Mars”
     
    • Like x 1
  10. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,221
    Location:
    Michigan
    In your discussion of equipment needed and logistics difficulty, are you considering the planned ability of BFS to travel to the moon and return to Earth without a moon based refueling?
     
  11. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,154
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Refueling would need to happen. It would just happen in Earth orbit according to Elon when he introduced the BFR. If they had methane and LOX on the Moon, it could happen there too. If BFR/BFS happens as expected and is a critical piece of getting a Moonbase built then they may as well build a refueling center there for BFS.

    Here is some ideas from Isaac Arthur.

     
    • Like x 1
  12. Nikxice

    Nikxice Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    984
    Location:
    Hudson, NH
    I'll give Robert Zubrin credit for his endorsement of SpaceX's rockets and his exuberance for a Moon base. His four year timeline seems to good to be true. Even facing an extended crunch time during the sixties, Grumman took almost seven years to produce a space-worthy LM. Minor nitpick, Zubrin refers to it as a Lunar Excursion Module. That name was actually dropped several years before it flew. It was still pronounced LEM, but NASA felt that an "excursion" sounded too much like a day at the beach. Perhaps the biggest challenge Grumman faced was learning where to shave weight while insuring the safety of humans occupants. Zubrin is asking much more of his proposed LEV, fifty years later lunar gravity remains unchanged.
     
    • Like x 1
  13. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,221
    Location:
    Michigan
    Yah, some number of Earth orbit BFS-tankers get sent up to top off their sister ships before BFS-cargo or BFS-crew head to the moon. The post mentioned needing Hydrogen/ Oxygen engines and on moon fuel production so I wasn't sure where that requirement came from.
     
    • Like x 1
  14. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    18,847
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    My post addressed the specific plan that Zubrin laid out in his article. His plan would use F9 and FH launches to build the moonbase. His main point is that SpaceX right now has the capability to provide the transport to build a moonbase at a cost that is easily within NASA’s budget if the SLS/DSG boondoggle is cancelled. No BFR required.

    Would the BFR make his moonbase project easier? Yes because it would not require refueling on the moon. But all the other components of the moonbase would still be needed, and they would take many years to develop and at a very significant cost.

    His article makes such a moonbase project sound relatively easy, as if the SpaceX transport services were the bulk of the cost. I feel Ike he is deliberately obscuring the development time and cost of the other components of the project.
     
    • Like x 2
    • Helpful x 1
  15. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,154
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Elon responded to a question about a moonbase today:
    Question: When's the moonbase gonna get built?
    Elon: 2025
    Elon Musk on Twitter
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC