And yes the MT article contains more than a few errors. Here’s another one:
“There's evidence of Tesla responding to criticism elsewhere around the car, too, such as a remodeling of the rear-seat shape with different cushioning. (In case you're curious, the frunk's capacity remains unchanged.)”
Since changing the rear seat design could not possible have any impact on the frunk capacity, I assume the author meant to write trunk.
“There's evidence of Tesla responding to criticism elsewhere around the car, too, such as a remodeling of the rear-seat shape with different cushioning. (In case you're curious, the frunk's capacity remains unchanged.)”
Since changing the rear seat design could not possible have any impact on the frunk capacity, I assume the author meant to write trunk.