pdx_m3s
Active Member
Measuring degradation using “rated miles” at 100% charge is less than idea, as Tesla can change the internal wh/mile constant whenever they so feel.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Measuring degradation using “rated miles” at 100% charge is less than idea, as Tesla can change the internal wh/mile constant whenever they so feel.
Bro...Maybe they don’t make the batteries like they used to?
Try this and report your result....
Look at any of the consumption graphs. Take the Wh/ml and range.
Note battery % (as a fraction).
kWh = (Wh/ml x remaining range) / (battery % x 1000).
Ex. (240 x 110) / (0.5 x 1000) = 52.8kWh
I always get 52.5kWh as the answer. But not tried since V10.0, will report back.
I get 51.9 doing this method. 100% charge calculates to 237. Mine has 3k miles on it.
At 0% displayed you usually have no reserve. Most of the cars will shut down plus or minus a little bit of 0%. Do not count on any amount of "reserve tank" ever. Some people rarely get lucky with that and get a few, but that is not normal.So at 0% displayed do we have approx 2-3kWh reserve. 10 miles approx ?
looks they ended up locking your battery to a SR vs unlocking SR to SR+ . The coders here can explain how
I made an appointment with Tesla. If they can’t resolve the issue then I expect to refund to a basic sr price.
I shouldn’t have to play a “what if?” game to determine a charge on the vehicle. If Tesla says 240 mile per charge then that should not mean 205, 220, or 229.
You are only warrantied to retain 70% of the battery capacity. (And that is only for 8 years or 100k miles.) So anything over 168 is considered "good enough".
Though we are pretty sure that Tesla has been adjusting the range calculations recently...
My SR is at 202 miles only after 4months and 7k miles. Will probably request service if it dips below 200, but it’s definitely annoying seeing almost 20miles missing in less than 6months. I’ll try the recalibration 3x and see if that improves, but I Only managed to do one and it made things worse.
Just curious but why are some of you downgrading your software models??Voluntarily downgraded my SR+ to SR a few weeks ago. Went from 238 at 100% (after 6 months and 17k miles) to 209, which has since further decreased to 207.
Do you live in Florida? This happened to a bunch of M3s in Florida the date of hurricane Dorian when they tried to bump up the range of all M3.OP probably has a SR+ that got locked somehow. I have a similar "issue" of not getting the 220 for a SR @ 100% (more like 210 now ) but I think that has more to do with my highway driving.
I'd be curious what a lemon law judge/lawyer says about this? Laugh? Evs are relatively new to the auto laws
Has your range problem been resolved?It has nothing to do with the way you drive, it
I went to service, it's pointless, they kept my car over night, didn't do anything, they have no clue how to fix it. My opinion - it's the downgrade, so only way to fix it is a software update. I was at around 240 before downgrade and the day downgrade it's 202-204 at 100%. (2019 April SR 9000 miles)
I did deep cycle many times, didn't change anything