I believe I have the V2.
SOC = 65% --> 461 kW | MBP ON
SOC = 94% --> 470 kW | MBP OFF
SOC = 82% --> 484 kW | MBP ON
SOC = 65% --> 461 kW | MBP ON
SOC = 94% --> 470 kW | MBP OFF
SOC = 82% --> 484 kW | MBP ON
My request that the Arizona Attorney General's office investigate Tesla's changes to Ludicrous Mode
- Thread starter azdryheat
- Start date
jerjozwik
Active Member
I believe I have the V2.
Without launch mode on every test.
SOC = 65% --> 461 kW | MBP ON --> READY
SOC = 94% --> 470 kW | MBP OFF
SOC = 82% --> 484 kW | MBP ON --> READY
I believe I will get 510 kW on SOC 100% MBP READY
davidc18
Active Member
I have a V2 and the best I have seen is 490 at 95soc max battery on and ready.
check the battery part number to be sure.
check the battery part number to be sure.
davidc18
Active Member
They will say "See, Tesla made things right!" while ignoring everything else.
davidc18
Active Member
V1 1063792-00-A
V2 1071394-00-A
V3 1088792-00-A
V2 1071394-00-A
V3 1088792-00-A
zanary
Active Member
Question: Was there any reduction in the P100D battery (1086755-00-C or 1086755-00-D)? If so, does the latest update improve the P100D numbers at all? Anyone know how many amps that delivers when Max Battery is Engaged alongside Ludicrous + Easter Egg?
This article
A Closer Look at the 2017 Tesla Model S P100D's Ludicrous Acceleration Run - Motor Trend
says they monitored a peak of 1850 amps from the battery during ludicrous plus mode.
What?!?! Arguments were done and Team Tesla had just finished admitting to degrading the performance of the vehicle. Looks to me like they made an informed estimation that they were about to lose a judgement and have to read about it on Electrek, etc.
In my opinion, this exactly shows their unwillingness to remedy the mistake without legal intervention.
P100DHG.
Member
I tend to agree with your hypothesis. The press has not been good on this as it is. Maybe a loss, even in small claims court would have been enough to damage their "P"erformance branding beyond their liking or ability to repair.
zanary
Active Member
zanary
Active Member
I have the v1 battery (1063792-00-A), and a 2016 June MSP90DL build and the most current firmware (2017.32.6.ca28227)
All below times were with Max Battery On and Engaged, Launch Mode Used, Range Mode Off, AC on, but set for 70 degrees, so it was running with Fan on 1 or 2 and at night, so lights were on.
Run #1 - 99% SOC = 3.0 seconds, 454 kW
20 seconds of wait time.
Run #2 - 98% SOC = 3.0 seconds, 456 kW
1 minute of wait time.
Run #3 - 97% SOC = 3.0 seconds, 456 kW
20 seconds of wait time.
Run #4 - 96% SOC = 3.0 seconds, 457 kW
Numbers were pretty consistent across these four runs.
I didn't see any increase of kW from my runs earlier this year on the older firmware, however I do have a v1 battery, and after 19,000 miles, 100% SOC went down from 270 (day I picked it up) to 253 miles (today).
The battery degradation on 90 kWh is certainly much greater than with old 85 kWh...
Which version is 1071941-00-A? I've seen a few of us on here with that but I can't ever tell which "Vx" that would be. I've looked at the spreadsheets, pdf, etc, but must be missing it.
