There has been some discussion in various threads about supercharger naming.
Tesla names them, and we name them in supercharge.info. Should they match?
Often we name them first, because we spot them in permit or construction stage before they are on the Tesla website. In some cases Tesla has them listed as a coming soon and we can line them up, but often not.
If Tesla has a "bad name" (website and nav) should supercharge.info follow that, or should they use a better name?
Here is a prime example: Supercharger - Saint-Léonard-d’Aston, QC (Madrid 2.0)
Some recent posts related to naming I have seen.
Tesla names them, and we name them in supercharge.info. Should they match?
Often we name them first, because we spot them in permit or construction stage before they are on the Tesla website. In some cases Tesla has them listed as a coming soon and we can line them up, but often not.
If Tesla has a "bad name" (website and nav) should supercharge.info follow that, or should they use a better name?
Here is a prime example: Supercharger - Saint-Léonard-d’Aston, QC (Madrid 2.0)
Some recent posts related to naming I have seen.
In my opinion, all location names should follow what’s on the Tesla navigation system.
I suggest changing the name of the Lincoln Park location in supercharge.info to match plugshare or Tesla. Plugshare lists it as Schiller Street and Tesla lists it as Halstead street. Nothing on the map or other listings references Lincoln Park, which is confusing.
Nice! I haven't hit the second Philly charger yet. Who the heck at Tesla can I wag my finger at about the name "East Market?" No such thing. Market East, yes. Market Street, yes. Gallery, yes, but "East Market" isn't a thing!