@Enginerd I think you really need to change that reporting format.
We all KNOW there's a bully behavior on HW2.5; it hogs the passing lane. Frankly, it doesn't affect my driving comfort, I just tap the blinker lever to get out of the passing lane,
if I feel like it, and it does it competently and safely. Note that in many jurisdictions there is no statutory obligation to vacate the leftmost lane.
I'd suggest excluding bully hogging, which isn't an event but rather
a judgement as to when an event SOULD have occurred, and logging that in a separate table, so we can see both it and the actual failure events.
The problem is that by including these non-events in your tabulation you're
obscuring the core results we'd like to know about: how's the NOA, how is it handling lane changes, is it getting better. Your chart implies the NOA is going to hell, from the high 90s to under 30%, and that's not the case at all.
You also don't have a way to convey
how slick a successful lane change was. With V10 the confidence and
tightness of fit keep improving. In fact I'm constantly amazed at how intelligently it works, how appropriately aggressive at times, and how deferential at others. Some might judge a tight squeeze or an occasional game of chicken poker as "uncomfortable success". At a freeway onramp where 2 feeder lanes marge, I LOVE sitting back and watching Nicki work it out. It's what it takes. Bona fide AI in action.
I love to hear how others are experiencing it, so I regret that your chart isn't more relevant to my NOA experience. I find the system way
way better than a few months ago.
Let's agree we're eagerly waiting for HW3 or whatever will fix the bullying, and in the interim please continue to tabulate and display
actual lane change problem events
.