TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Navigate on Autopilot is Useless (2018.42.3)

Discussion in 'Autopilot & Autonomous/FSD' started by wk057, Nov 4, 2018.

  1. totteraptor

    totteraptor Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2019
    Messages:
    131
    Location:
    Switzerland
    My 2010 Mercedes E350 has less Phantom braking than my 2019 Model 3 with the full FSD package :-(
    It is an enigma to me why my Tesla continues to have this problem. It was solved a decade ago so why on earth is Tesla struggling so much with getting it right???
     
    • Disagree x 3
  2. emmz0r

    emmz0r Senior Software Engineer

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    1,149
    Location:
    Norway
    The reason is that it had a bunch of other sources like camera and ultrasonic sensors and it fuse the result and weighs it
     
    • Helpful x 1
  3. John J

    John J Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2020
    Messages:
    21
    Location:
    McLean, VA
    I did not say the driving experience is not good. The flat torque curve with no transmission and smooth power application makes for a great drive. What I said was the software is not reliable. I stand by that statement. Maybe you believe that it is a good marketing tactic for Elon Musk to tout features that do not exist, but I do not.
     
    • Like x 2
    • Disagree x 1
  4. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Confused by your "a couple of months" phrase. I've been using NoA since 2018 and use it every day. Used it this morning. No disengagements other than the two times two different insane drivers almost merged into my lane. Zero terrible decisions made.
     
  5. Silicon Desert

    Silicon Desert Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2018
    Messages:
    3,028
    Location:
    Sparks Nevada / GF 1
    yes, I was thinking the same thing. I was confused. Works perfectly for me. I guess not well for everyone though.
     
  6. Daniel in SD

    Daniel in SD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Messages:
    6,281
    Location:
    San Diego
    Tesla could easily get rid of phantom braking but then the car would run into more stuff. I bet your Mercedes would run right in to stopped cars way more often if left unattended.
    Autopilot needs to be safer in real world usage so Tesla has to compensate for all the people who abuse it by making it err on the side of caution. Simple adaptive cruise control doesn't have that issue so it doesn't have to try to "see" stationary objects.
     
    • Informative x 1
  7. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    The people who don't own FSD yet reading this thread, please just know that some people here are overstating how useless NoA is. I use it every day and therefore isn't useless. It drives me to work. It's the best feature of any car I've ever owned, hands down.

    Does it sometimes make stupid decisions still? Yes. It is getting better? Yes. It is useless? Only if you have insanely high expectations for the software, I guess.
     
    • Like x 1
  8. diplomat33

    diplomat33 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,832
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN USA
    I can say that I have had mixed results with NOA. It works fine for most routine situations but I've had it completely miss my exits, oversteer too strongly when getting into an exit, wait too long to merge onto the freeway, make lane changes that don't make sense etc...

    That's the challenge with developing a system to work "everywhere". There are a lot of different roads, drivers, conditions to account for. NOA might indeed work great for you and work terrible for someone else.
     
  9. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Maybe my problem here is misunderstanding the word "useless." Like, if I use it but still 100% pay attention to how it drives me, is that useless? I guess maybe that is what people are saying. If we could have some sort of criteria by which we could deem it useful, that would help me. When is NoA "good enough" for wk52 and Dr. Dabbles?
     
  10. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Sure, I have too have had mixed results and all those issues. Doesn't make it useless.
     
    • Like x 1
    • Disagree x 1
  11. Daniel in SD

    Daniel in SD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Messages:
    6,281
    Location:
    San Diego
    I love Autopilot but I don't use NoA so there are differing opinions. I'd much rather be able to change lanes myself without disengaging Autopilot than use NoA. I will say that auto lane change works fine now that there's no traffic anymore.
    99% of time on the interstate I'm just staying in a lane so having a machine help (somewhat poorly and unpredictably) with the other 1% just isn't very valuable.
     
    • Like x 1
  12. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Traffic is nearly back to normal in DC and auto lane change is working better than it ever has. It's pretty aggressive these days (not in terms of how often it changes--I have that set to "mild"--but in how it changes lanes either when it wants or when I ask it to).
     
  13. DanCar

    DanCar Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,670
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    What is your commute like? How often does NOA do something versus regular autopilot. How many freeway exits does it get you ready for? I'm assuming that is what you like about NOA?
     
  14. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    My commute is, roughly, entrance 495 (DC beltway) east to I-95N to 32E to exit, about 26 miles in total. So, it takes all 4 exits just great and also does a good job of navigating the traffic, especially in the morning. In the evening, when I go from I-95S to 495W, I ask the car to change lanes very quickly from the far right to the far left in order to avoid backups on the New Hampshire exit which are extremely common during the evening commute. While I wish the car understood that this was the best strategy, I don't expect it to understand that fact for now.
     
    • Informative x 1
    • Like x 1
  15. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    It sure would be nice for Dabs to acknowledge that his definition of "terrible decision" isn't universal, and that in general, instead of speaking in vague terms like that, be explicit about why he disagrees with the decisions the car is making, so that we can judge for ourselves if we think those decisions are terrible. Like I said, I rarely give a side eye to the car these days, though I admit it happens on occasion. My guess is our thresholds for giving the side eye are just radically different.

    Like I'll give an example of a questionable decision it made today. It wasn't terrible, but I did roll my eyes. It moved into the passing lane and then moved immediately back out of it. That's pretty dumb. But it terrible? No. Does it render it useless? Hell no.
     
    • Like x 1
  16. timewasted

    timewasted Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2017
    Messages:
    196
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Current version is 2020.32.2. NoA is absolutely wonderful if I only have to get in a lane and never get out of it. Anything more and it’s... pause for dramatic effect... useless. I don’t mean “it’s ok but I disagree with some of the decisions it makes”, I mean “useless”. I’ve literally never had a positive experience with it despite trying to give it a chance to not suck for a period of time after every update. The only good thing I can say is that it hasn’t killed me yet, but that’s not necessarily due to lack of trying.

    The thread title was, and continues to be, apt.
     
    • Like x 1
  17. clydeiii

    clydeiii Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    What decisions does it make that you disagree with?
     
  18. S4WRXTTCS

    S4WRXTTCS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2015
    Messages:
    5,305
    Location:
    Snohomish, WA
    I think its important to point out that there are multiple causes of phantom braking. Where a lot of times the false braking is the result of inadequate testing, and not because they tuned it to error on the side of caution.

    Like for me the primary cause of phantom braking seems to be semi truck trailers. This seems to happen just as easily in TACC as in AP. I don't see the need for it under TACC. Adaptive cruise control these days is pretty widely available on new cars so there is no reason for Tesla to make it more complicated than it needs to be.

    Those that use AP tend to get false braking because of incorrect speed limits which is once again a failing on Tesla. There is no official way of updating speed limits. So these things continue to happen.

    It's so bad that people have been changing where they put their foot. I've come across comments on FB/TMC/Reddit saying things along the lines of "I hover my foot over the throttle so I can catch it fast", and that's crazy because it's not a safe way to drive.
     
  19. emmz0r

    emmz0r Senior Software Engineer

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    1,149
    Location:
    Norway
    #979 emmz0r, Aug 27, 2020
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2020
    They are actually making it less complicated for themselves. Instead of messing with the sensor input part of the control loop, they just skip the steering part of the control algorithm. That's simpler for them. But that also brings in all the downsides from what's needed for steering and other things.
    The steering part is probably calculated but just not used.
     
    • Like x 1
  20. Battpower

    Battpower Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    1,950
    Location:
    Uk
    These are probably my main two gripes, especially the timing of merging when joining the main road. (UK)

    Many on ramps have little or no dead zone at the end of the merging lane, and most every time on certain junctions, even with no traffic on the main carriageway, NoA puts on the turn signal then resolutely clings to on ramp lane (without slowing down either) to the point that you have no option but to take over control.

    It's frustrating to start (most) NoA sessions with a disengagement at the first manoeuvre.
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC