To answer briefly...your system is on par with mine, we are getting similar production numbers for this time of year. The shape of your solar production looks appropriate...therefore, most likely your system is working as it should. Would have recommended an additional power wall or 2 to help shift your solar production thru peak times (depending on your rate plan selected). Also may be more of an issue on max generation during the summer and potential clipping due to inverters size.
It is challenging to make direct comparison of panel vs tile here with others systems. Besides other variables, tile is less efficient then panels, and your system was likely setup with the idea to maximize Pv which is why you have 1/3 facing NE. Those are in essence not working during this time of year. As others mention, look at the projections you were given as to annual production in comparison to your past history of energy used. If estimated production was less then or equal to consumption for the year, then this is the time of year you will be in negative and be "paying" for the extra...particularly with the warm days recently and your need for AC. You will make it up in the summer and earn credits to use with PGE during these "winter" months. Can also get more granular as to how production decreases during different months by playing thru the production values thru PvWatts if you want. Not going to change anything you do at this point, but may be helpful to understand and to become less worried about the expectantly "low" production numbers you are seeing.
AS to getting what you paid for...
I assume cosmetic concerns were paramount in your decision as well as the capital improvement to having a new roof installed. How much is that worth to you for your Bay Area home as opposed to just the solar power generation?