whitex
Well-Known Member
First, you'd need an estimate of the demand for used Tesla's. Then you'd need to know what is the number of cars available from private sellers. Tesla owning 1,500 cars world-wide doesn't necessary give them control of the market, if the demand is small (and demand is definitely a function of price, so holding the prices high just reduces demand).Actually, Tesla does control the market. They currently openly have nearly 1% all model S's ever built as CPO. That's enough to control the market in my opinion.
Actually, you said 1% of all cars ever made, that's almost 2000 cars. Then, combine the favorable interest with depreciation of these cars (1% per month easy) and storage/maintenance costs and it probably won't be that small of the cost. However, if you still say it's a negligible cost, then why is Tesla releasing all those high mileage cars at lower prices if holding them back was so cheap and provided such an important benefit of keeping residual values high for cars out there? High residual values help lease more new cars too.False. To the shareholder, the losses on keeping that money 'locked' up are minimal compared with the losses Tesla potentially has to take on outstanding liabilities for cars still out there covered by the RVG and leases. Especially because the money isn't really locked : formerly the warehouse credit facility, and today the asset backed line allow Tesla to borrow cash against their inventory. At a very favourable rate. So the real cost of keeping 1000 of these cars as inventory on the books is likely a few million.