curmudgeon
Member
Yes indeed. Its' frightening to see emotions distort perception of reality like this.You need to calm down and try and regain some sense of perspective.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes indeed. Its' frightening to see emotions distort perception of reality like this.You need to calm down and try and regain some sense of perspective.
Well said. I'm not bothering to reply to this character further as I've much better things to do!Do you pay to walk down the street? Because that has the same impact on the environment and others as cycling.
I hate to say I told you so…I don’t really want to get into a bike v car match - they never end well
Yes, it’s called Council Tax. Cycle lanes are not part of that budget though, certainly not the one I have been referring to. The impact is simple, a whole traffic lane in each direction has been removed from motor vehicles use to be given to cyclists ….who are not using it, so why has it been repurposed and who paid for it, who now maintains it too? Does it come from Council Tax or Road Tax, because it’s no longer a road, just an empty space with rubbish blowing about because no one uses it. A bit of a no mans land now so pointless.Do you pay to walk down the street? Because that has the same impact on the environment and others as cycling.
The thing is, those bongs / chimes / interventions are the direct result of your driving leading a completely impartial observer to say "that's dangerous", and intervene.You can’t disable the vast majority of safety features, don’t get me wrong, I would do if I could. As I’ve managed well over 30yrs without an accident or claim I reckon I can do pretty well without the bings, bongs & chimes.
Yes, I saw the Times piece a few days ago and the Grauniad comment, which deserves a read, earlier today.If you can see beyond the usual left wing/right wing editorial arguments, it’s an interesting article and worth a few minutes…
Has the Times declared war on cyclists?
Editorial calling for cycling licences and insurance is odd given paper’s previous campaigns for safer roadswww.theguardian.com
It did that some years ago.Yes, I saw the Times piece a few days ago and the Grauniad comment, which deserves a read, earlier today.
The Times has completely lost the plot.
As both a motorist and cyclist I can see, and sympathise, with both sides of the argument.
I spend more than they do on transport so how dare they go faster than me!
I'd love to be able to cycle to work but given my route is along narrow country roads (shortest is actually a single track with passing points) totally unlit for the majority of the route there is no way I'd want to risk it.
Difference between your route and mine is yours appears to have at least somewhere to go if you have to - mine is a lot more a case of ending up in a hedge.Lithium Ion cells aren't just good for EVs, the amount of lighting you can get on a pedal bike is now mad, and not for much cost. I commute on exactly the type of road you mention, for Dec/Jan I did roughly 50% of commutes on the bike. The days/nights are now getting light enough to the point where lights allow you to be seen rather than lighting up the road.
I run x2 front lights on the handle bars, and x2 rear light on the bike, than one on the backpack. I also have a helmet light that provides front and rear lighting.
Depends on the time of day you leave, taking in the country side is a great way to start the day. The only real risk isn't cars, its ice. I've fallen off twice in the last 18 months due to lack of grip on the roads. I've yet to come across any 'angry' driver when out on the country side roads.
Difference between your route and mine is yours appears to have at least somewhere to go if you have to - mine is a lot more a case of ending up in a hedge.