jgleigh
Member
How does one know if you “allowed” to charge from the grid?
Storm Watch definitely charges from the grid so anyone should be allowed. You just normally don't want to do it since it's not cost efficient.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does one know if you “allowed” to charge from the grid?
Here in AZ, I haven't seen this option on the app yet. Though, I do see that my app updates like a week or so after the members here.
I have PW+'s. Maybe that is why these options are available?
How does one know if you “allowed” to charge from the grid?
In reality I am sure the IRS will probably never audit anyone for just the ITC, but wonder how it would work since if you ever have a storm watch event you could not claim that you charged the PW 100% with solar which means you can't claim 100% of the ITC.According to the support page, yes, the Permission to Export setting is available for Powerwall+. Because of the integrated solar inverter, Powerwall+ has more direct control over how much solar is exported to the grid, where it can't with other solar inverters. (So, one would not expect to see this on a system without Powerwall+)
Somewhat paraphrasing from the support page: In the US, the grid charging setting set to 'No' is intended to comply with the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) guidance from the Internal Revenue Service of charging your Powerwall 100% from solar. When set to ‘Yes,’ Powerwall will charge from the grid[...]. Consider your energy goals and consult your tax advisor regarding any tax-related impacts before enabling Grid Charging.
In PG&E land, it is cost efficient. I could charge PWs at $.13/kWh and export solar at $.59/kWhStorm Watch definitely charges from the grid so anyone should be allowed. You just normally don't want to do it since it's not cost efficient.
I loaded another phone with version 4. I am not seeing charge from grid. Is there certain FW I need on the GW for this?
In PG&E land, it is cost efficient. I could charge PWs at $.13/kWh and export solar at $.59/kWh
Not attacking your post just stating Tesla's logic makes no sense to me. All inverters for the last several years must have the ability to be able to be driven from the utility in terms of limiting solar production. I have yet to see examples of when it has been applied but it's there.According to the support page, yes, the Permission to Export setting is available for Powerwall+. Because of the integrated solar inverter, Powerwall+ has more direct control over how much solar is exported to the grid, where it can't with other solar inverters. (So, one would not expect to see this on a system without Powerwall+)
I don't think either the power company or the IRS has a way of finding out that you're grid charging. All the power company can see is that you're using energy, not what it's being used for. Tesla would have to be the one to notify them of the grid charging. I'm not sure why Tesla would do this unless somehow obligated to.What are the implications of grid charging if you've used the tax credit? Will the power company send me a letter? Will the IRS find out? Is it supposed to be the honor system?
My solar export rate is $0.1045/kWh, but I buy power at $0.051/kWh, so it's advantageous for me to charge from the grid, but obviously "against the rules".
Not quite—the utility has smart inverter control over solar inverters (including the Powerwall+ solar inverter) while on-grid, not the Powerwall. Powerwall uses similar controls (e.g., microgrid frequency changes) while off-grid, but it cannot and will not mess with the grid to control other inverters while on-grid.Not attacking your post just stating Tesla's logic makes no sense to me. All inverters for the last several years must have the ability to be able to be driven from the utility in terms of limiting solar production. I have yet to see examples of when it has been applied but it's there.
Right, but that signal from the utility is just the AC frequency, there's no out-of-band communications.Not attacking your post just stating Tesla's logic makes no sense to me. All inverters for the last several years must have the ability to be able to be driven from the utility in terms of limiting solar production. I have yet to see examples of when it has been applied but it's there.
Not at the bottom of Powerwall | Advanced Settings? It is showing for my GW2 and ipad running app version 4.7.3I’m with you … no grid charge option under the Powerwall settings. My screen says operation mode where I select time based control and set a utility rate plan. Nothing else appears there…
Gateway 2 running 22.9.1, iOS app 4.7.3
I am so glad I have enough solar I just set and ignore. No need to play with stuff to try and save a few bucks.I’m with you … no grid charge option under the Powerwall settings. My screen says operation mode where I select time based control and set a utility rate plan. Nothing else appears there…
Gateway 2 running 22.9.1, iOS app 4.7.3
Not at the bottom of Powerwall | Advanced Settings? It is showing for my GW2 and ipad running app version 4.7.3
h20,Does one have to manually set the reserve to like 100 first?
Per the documentation, denying export means throttling the solar production to match house consumption after PW is full. My older Enphase micro-inverters can not do that, but apparently Tesla's modern inverters can.not the "Permission to Export" option
Last night, in off-peak time, mine grid charged at 3.3kW. Reserve was still set at my usual summertime setting of 20%.Does one have to manually set the reserve to like 100 first? I do not want to go back to V4 until this option really works, even though it is of
no use for me now, only in the dead of winter.