One set of key words is customer owns. I still have not been able to get grid charge working. Seems lots of finger pointing going on within tesla. How hard can this be?
It's a circle of blaming. Which sucks because homeowners don't have the influence to break one of the blame-chains without basically suing. Ugh.
The normal "tier 1 support" people haven't been helpful since they tend to just make stuff up and want to close their tickets to make their gamification metrics. I'm sure
@jjrandorin has a lot of experience in this behavior heh.
But, I never just settle... so I've been in touch with Tesla's tier 2, Sunrun's local director of ops, and PG&E's interconnection team (like I'm literally contacting the individual managers in that group).
Tesla says they are beholden to the data provided to them by Sunrun and PG&E. Basically the Non-Tesla parties specify the rules Tesla must abide around grid charging, grid export of stored solar energy, grid export of stored grid energy, or grid export of contemporaneous solar generation from the rooftop array. So, Tesla says either Sunrun or PG&E has instructed Tesla to bar me from grid charging and grid exporting anything except what my solar array produces. Tesla also say as a "catch all" they've barred any system that they believe to be 3x or more Powerwalls in California from getting access to advanced features because they aren't supporting NEM2-MT interconnection agreements for lowly (I added this adverb) residential homeowners.
@Vines is a special snowflake that shouldn't have advanced options I guess.
Sunrun says they are beholden to their internal policies around their system rights for solar and ESS. Regarding grid charging; this is a 100% straight up non-starter. They won't allow anyone to do grid charging out of normal policy; the only exemption is "Stormwatch" which apparently falls outside of the guidelines of grid-charging ESS policy.
A couple of Sunrun people said that if I wanted to grid export edit stored energy in my batteries, then I had to sign up for their VPP / Brightbox. Of course the problem with that is then Sunrun controls the export; not me. And that's not cool.
I dug a bit deeper and I think things get muddled because Sunrun applied for their own VPP with the CAISO (Zabe can probably explain more about this). Here is a link to a joint working between Tesla, Sunrun, CESA, CALSSA, and others for some behind the meter variable response blah blah blah. From this, Sunrun has dropped in their VPP to PG&E and SCE coverage areas (I can't find more info about this because I suck).
I think this is where things get stupid for me (but for some reason not skeptical cyclist). Basically Sunrun by its interconnected BS to all of this won't allow grid charging or grid export out of principle as a homeowner controlled item. And they won't do anything to help someone like me break out of this because the red tape is too much. Edit: I think the problem is Sunrun didn't disaggregate their systems between ones homeowners owned and ones Sunrun owns. They just view themselves as "Sunrun" and act under one policy.
The utility hopes to encourage greater buildout of residential solar+storage through the initial 300 customer program.
www.utilitydive.com
PG&E says all they care about is approving interconnection agreements. They 100% never will reach out to or provide data to companies like Tesla and Sunrun for individual interconnection requests. The PG&E interconnection manager actually said to me she's been doing solar interconnections for a decade, and I'm the first random homeowner ever to actually get a hold of her directly about a PTO that was already approved. All PG&E can do is say my NEM2-MT agreement is valid (which they have provided confirmation numerous times my PTO is valid). So PG&E just points me to Rule 21 language and tell me to fix stuff with Tesla or Sunrun.