Even if you were citing real examples
I am- again there's lots of posts from P3D- members who've bought MPP brake upgrades, lighter wheels, etc and also track the car.
Usually getting better results, for less money, than P3D+ owners.
Not sure why you doubt this when you can just browse through the forums yourself if you've somehow never seen these people.
, it is not indicative of the breadth of ownership intent. We're talking about expensive luxury toys with intrinsic depreciation, and within that financial whirlpool we're talking about track days.
yes- and most P owners of both kinds never track the car in the first place.
We're already talking about a minority of a minority either way.
Making an argument that there's some "correct" financial methodology solely based on first-pass clear end point development means you're not trailblazing, only following distantly in others footsteps. If you're tight on money and trying to keep up with the Joneses, you're unfortunately setting yourself up to be slow and broke. Saving $5k in the big picture is only about 5 track weekends worth of entry fees and consumables, a fraction of many track rats' seasons.
If you were in the small minority of owners who tracked previous cars- you'd probably be coming into buying a 3 thinking about...tracking the 3.
In which case saving the 5k and using that toward better-than-OEM upgrades makes a lot of sense.
Especially if also live someplace the 20s are a non-starter anyway because of potholes and such.
This has little to do with how "tight" anybody is on money and more to do with the smartest place to put that $ to get the car you want in the config you want it.
Now, TODAY, that argument looks a bit different since the $5000 discount for skipping the PuP is gone...but that was not the case for most of the time the +/- choice existed.
You'd still be stuck with the junk heavy 20s, but apparently lots of folks need these to replace the ones damaged by potholes so it's a sellers market!