You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I find it really surprising that some of you can find the use of brake lights under regen braking annoying. Hey, everybody is entitled to an opinion, but to me, when I read those statements, it sounds like saying the use of blinkers when changing lanes is annoying. Or the use of lights, unless it is pitch black, is annoying. To me, it doesn´t make sense.
You see, one of the most important things to have safe driving conditions is predictability, IMO. When we have a system that is predictable, the possibility of having accidents decreases a lot. If you drive in an unpredictable way, you will cause accidents.
So, just as much as driving at night without lights (or changing lanes all of a sudden without using blinkers) may cause accidents, decelerating more than 99% of the cars out there (which is what the Model S does) without brake lights, can cause accidents.
Whether you find it annoying or not, warning others that your speed is decreasing at a rate that they don´t expect is a good thing. It can save your life.
So let me ask you this, you're concerned about being on the autobahn above 85 MPH. Ok, so now let's say you expect traffic in front of you to be cruising along in the left lane at 150 MPH. The car in front of you (and this could be 100+ car lengths) slams on the brakes and decellerates at 1.5+G's. You should do the same, no? OK. Now the car in front of you lets of the accelerator and slows down from 150 MPH to 140 MPH. He's 100+ car lengths away, a distance which it is difficult to determine his actual speed or rate of deceleration. Do you slam on your brakes? Well if it was any normal car (brakes came on), you probably should. If it was a Tesla with your rules, who knows...
The bottom line is brake lights may you "feel" safe, whereas brake lights coming on on the highway when you aren't emergency braking is less safe for _everyone_ behind you and is an anti-social behavior.
The bottom line is brake lights may you "feel" safe, whereas brake lights coming on on the highway when you aren't emergency braking is less safe for _everyone_ behind you and is an anti-social behavior.
It all depends how close the car behind you is. Not everybody drives at 100+ car lengths. Especially those wanting to drive above 120 mph on the autobahns...
so now that you've charted it, is there a correlation to rate of deceleration and the brake lights?
Or, is it a threshold based system? meaning, X KW at Y Speed = brake lights.
Initial Speed (kph) | Final Speed (kph) | Elapsed time (sec) | Deceleration (m/s) |
170 | 160 | 2,527 | -1,1 |
160 | 150 | 2,551 | -1,1 |
150 | 140 | 2,304 | -1,2 |
140 | 130 | 2,314 | -1,2 |
130 | 120 | 2,862 | -1 |
120 | 110 | 2,409 | -1,15 |
110 | 100 | 2,001 | -1,39 |
100 | 90 | 2,229 | -1,25 |
80 | 70 | 2,174 | -1,28 |
Do you also think that the lights shouldn't come on at 80mph? Because I can't imagine a basis for thinking they should come on at 80mph but not 85mph.
Well, I was not after the threshold kW/speed thing (I don´t think I´m expressing this very scientifically, but I guess I understood you and you understand me).
What I was after is comparing the deceleration levels above and below 85 mph, to try to see if there was a reason there for not having brake lights. And as you can see on the table, deceleration above 85 mph can be as strong as below (example: 150 to 140 kph VS. 100 to 90 kph)...
I don't think they should come on with small amount of deceleration at highway speeds at all
The algorithm is likely using the contribution of regen to deceleration as part of the threshold, at high speeds atmospheric drag should exceed regen, and keep in mind the Model S basically has the lowest drag coefficient of any car on the road.
If you lift off the pedal completely, would you describe the resulting deceleration as a "small amount?"
If you check my chart, you'll see that I have measured very similar deceleration rates at 170 kph and at 100 kph...The faster you go, the less it is. Regen is fixed power, torque is inversely proportional to speed given fixed power, and torque is directly deceleration force.
If you check my chart, you'll see that I have measured very similar deceleration rates at 170 kph and at 100 kph...
If deceleration is stronger than other cars and can be unexpected, it needs to be signaled. Brake lights needed. Period.
It's not.
CC vs. TACC - 5mph behavior difference. Just another example.an inconsistency between AP and non-AP models. It's really as simple as that! It sounds like jpet checked with enough other owners to determine that this is a black and white split by AP / Non-AP.
In a previous (non-Tesla, non-regen) car you've had, when you let off the accelerator a bit -- even more than just to make it "coast" (maintain speed) -- such that it slows down ever so slightly. Would you want that vehicle to put the brake lights on? Probably not.I find it really surprising that some of you can find the use of brake lights under regen braking annoying.
Other ICE cars, I meant. Stronger in the Model S than 99% of them, probably. I'm not talking about a Mitsubishi EVO pimped from hell with two zillion hp.It's not.