mspohr
Well-Known Member
I don't know of any other car with redundant displays.So when the screen is not working or the OS running the screen locks up you'll know nothing about the car speed etc.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know of any other car with redundant displays.So when the screen is not working or the OS running the screen locks up you'll know nothing about the car speed etc.
It's quite clear the interior is a prototype.
Why in Heaven's name do they have 'music' on when they're talking to people about the car??Here is the video talking about there being only one screen and the fact that it's floating to allow for better air flow:
I personally also think it looks stuck on, but then again Mercedes is proud of they glued-on ipad design and some people like it. Interestingly I'd be more worried about software updates - think how often Model S got a cluster update vs. IVI update. They are tested to different standards (I've had the large screen reboot, partially stop working or crawl along at glacial speeds until reboot - not something acceptable in an instrument cluster).
Well, I've had 8 years of "un-conditioning" driving the Mini, and it's still annoying...For those that say they "need" instruments directly in front because it's faster to look at, your eye movements are equally fast in a glance down and straight as opposed to down and right. You are just conditioned to do the former.
Well, I've had 8 years of "un-conditioning" driving the Mini, and it's still annoying...
Back in the 80's when all-digital displays came into vogue, there were several studies that showed your brain could parse analog gauges with needles faster than digital displays of numbers.It actually takes longer for me to use the instruments in my car, because I have to scan for the speedometer needle, then check the gauge and then estimate if I'm at 44 or 46.
Nope, just a big ~6" analog gauge with a single needle. Yes, there are a bunch of idiot lights there, but they never turn on. Actually, that's where the fuel/temp gauges are, so there's a few minor distractions. And I spend a bit of mental energy monitoring the temp gauge, out of distrust of 12 year old hoses!Well yes, because the Mini instrument "thing" is a complicated design abomination of a hundred different graphical distractions, instead of a simple digital speed readout.
Years ago I started using a Garmin GPS. It is mounted in my car, just a little higher than where that screen is in the Model 3. I've grown very accustomed to viewing my speed via the much easier to read and more accurate GPS screen and barely ever use the actual instruments anymore. It actually takes longer for me to use the instruments in my car, because I have to scan for the speedometer needle, then check the gauge and then estimate if I'm at 44 or 46. For those that say they "need" instruments directly in front because it's faster to look at, your eye movements are equally fast in a glance down and straight as opposed to down and right. You are just conditioned to do the former.
I think that the screen + HUD would be ideal, as that would take away the "looking down" part entirely for basics like speed and GPS directions.
@Tina C - I agree with you assessment of the M3 prototype dashboard. I would like what you stated above but could live with something less functional.I would feel safer with a secondary display in front of the driver for the essentials like speed & battery. They get lost in big screen. What if the big screen froze up? Plus at night I would want to seriously dim or turn off the big screen. Plus there is the emptiness of the dashboard. I would like the big screen to look more built in, not just like it got stuck on the dash as an afterthought.
You might if you are navigatingYou are not looking down at the lower part of the screen.
I get why Tesla have done this; (in addition to the obvious cost saving) the driver could not be moved forward from the rear passengers' legs if you had the depth of a conventional instrument binnacle in front.
However, I'm certainly not pleased with the results; that this is close to final design alarms me. Quite apart from the dramatic violation of the "no weirdmobiles" rule, I have serious concerns about usability.
This isn't even equivalent to those annoying centre instrument layouts. At least they present primary information simply and separated from distractions. Here we have main instruments overlaid on a 15" screen that's busy as can be; that UI looked far too cluttered for the purpose.
No, I would far rather have seen even a small second screen in front of the driver, presenting the most relevant information - speed, battery state, odo/trip, power in/out, warnings/cautions. Ideally, navigation prompts. Autopilot status probably ought to be there too, when active.
Also, what about glare? Primary instruments have cowls for a reason, especially when they're LCDs.
Well, if I'm not mistaken, the NEW Mini (the BMW one) NOW HAS got a speedometer mounted just behind the steering wheel. I hope the "single display" will go the way of "no centre console" as I note the new S now has a centre console.
For me, the big issue is going to be reflections and "bleach out" of the display in strong sunlight. With that glass roof and the sun behind how much of the single screen will be masked by reflections or glare. The "drivers dash" is usually deeply hooded to restrict glare and to aid visibility. The test drives were done at night where this problem would not show up.
I also think that you don't need the HUD as much as you think when you're on autopilot. I use AP 95% of my commute and have the freedom to look at and use the center screen.