You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No plans is Tesla codeword for -- wait 6 months.
Serious question that sounds snarky: how rural do you have to be to need more than 100kWh? Isn't that a 100 mile round trip even in dreadful conditions? I'm trying to understand the benefit to a bigger battery instead of building out more and faster charging.So that's disappointing to hear. Tesla is still too California-centric. We cold weather & more rural owners need the larger battery.
What do people expect him to say, oh yes we have a 120 kWh pack in R&D right now and lose all sales of his current high end offering? Use some brain cells folks! Of course larger packs are coming as energy density increases. That's a no-brainer. But don't expect the CEO of a company who depends on sales to reveal a future roadmap that could tank those sales.
Serious question that sounds snarky: how rural do you have to be to need more than 100kWh? Isn't that a 100 mile round trip even in dreadful conditions? I'm trying to understand the benefit to a bigger battery instead of building out more and faster charging.
Here's my take on it in another thread.Serious question that sounds snarky: how rural do you have to be to need more than 100kWh? Isn't that a 100 mile round trip even in dreadful conditions? I'm trying to understand the benefit to a bigger battery instead of building out more and faster charging.
Tesla should just let people plan in the dark and then get angry later? That doesn't work in the long run. Tesla needs to open up its communication not shut down. This kind of style didn't work for the Communists.
If you look at 100D battery pack there's not much space for additional cells. Once they move to the new 2170 cell format Tesla will probably will be able to add another 20kWh.
Such battery pack is likely years away and not a priority for Tesla right now.
Serious question that sounds snarky: how rural do you have to be to need more than 100kWh? Isn't that a 100 mile round trip even in dreadful conditions? I'm trying to understand the benefit to a bigger battery instead of building out more and faster charging.
Tesla should just let people plan in the dark and then get angry later? That doesn't work in the long run. Tesla needs to open up its communication not shut down. This kind of style didn't work for the Communists.
If you look at 100kWh battery pack there's not much space for additional cells. Once they move to the new 2170 cell format Tesla will probably will be able to add another 20kWh.
120kWh battery pack is likely years away and not a priority for Tesla right now.
I thought such a pack is only about 12 months away.
No plans is Tesla codeword for -- wait 6 months.
If you look at 100kWh battery pack there's not much space for additional cells. Once they move to the new 2170 cell format Tesla will probably be able to add another 20kWh.
120kWh battery pack is likely years away and not a priority for Tesla right now.
I think years away is probably a bit much. It certainly isn't a priority right now, but I doubt Tesla will let anyone take either range or acceleration crowns away from them for long, so they are undoubtedly doing some low intensity work on how to get faster and will produce something when they get some real competition if not before.
2170 cells are also cheaper for Tesla, so if they get to a point where they have a surplus of those, a pack design available, and no contractual commitment for 18650s, it's in their interest to start making 2170 packs.