There is something "wrong". Tesla has opted to stay with their proprietary charging connector, and this is one of the results. Most public institutions/entities have a lot of trouble justifying the public lands utilization for something that restricts usage to only a subset of the public. This is why they aren't eligible for any of the VW dieselgate funding the states can spend on EV chargers, it's why Tesla almost never puts superchargers in lots owned by cities, etc. Most of the time, when they have been allowed to do so by public entities, it has been with the negotiated deal that Tesla will also install all the necessary electrical infrastructure to support universal chargers at the location should the entity decide to build some chargers on their own or find another universal EVCS provider who wants to build there. This comes with a significant cost increase for Tesla, but at least it sometimes lets them build on public lands. For example, this is how they
got approval for the new locations along the NJ tpke:
"The company will pay all design, construction, installation, and maintenance costs for the new superchargers at Turnpike locations,
as well as the cost of installing the necessary infrastructure to enable the installation of non-Tesla chargers by other providers."
I would be shocked if Tesla had never approached the NYS Throughway Authority about putting superchargers at the rest stops. And I imagine the proprietary nature of the Tesla connector was a major impediment and made any deal a non-starter so far.