As mentioned in
my post in
this other thread I had the meeting yesterday with two reps from the Net-Zero transport team in the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE).
It was a good meeting and a lot of ground was covered in a short time. Some of the take-outs regarding on-street charging:
- They had not considered power-pole mounted EVSEs as an option for on-street EV charging in areas with limited off-street parking (like the area I live in). In fact, I got the impression they'd never seen this type of solution before.
- They were impressed with the research I had done identifying four possible suppliers of such EVSEs (Ubitricity, char.gy, FLO and EVSE LLC).
- I explained this solution would be instead of, and not in addition to, the current proposal to install "ultra fast" DCFCs no more than 5km from any house for reasons of convenience, cost, ease of installation, scalability etc. Also only one landlord to deal with in Sydney (Ausgrid).
- It seems like they will follow this up and give it a closer look.
Discussion then moved onto other issues:
- They were curious if I knew when Tesla would open up SCs to non-Tesla EVs (obviously I don't know, they would have more success getting that info out of Tesla than I would )
- I pointed out the traffic figures on their interactive EV planning map are horribly wrong - they will look into it.
- The idea that temporary ad-hoc on-street charging should be permitted by running cables across footpaths with appropriate trip protection (e.g. this) was met with a somewhat stony silence... might not get any traction on that one!
- However they were interested in stories of OCs blocking apartment owners from installing EVSEs at their own cost - might get traction on that.
- Regarding new apartment blocks, they are absolutely working on updating the building code to make it mandatory for new builds to make provision for EV charging. They say a lot of this is market led in any event, developers see the value. But I did say that provision needs to be made to every parking space, not just a subset, as has been done in some countries. Really short sighted otherwise.
They pointed me to the Site Host Prospectus that is out for the first round of DCFC grants (closing Feb) and were interested in feedback:
The good news is that sites under this programme must have a minimum of
4 parking bays and DCFC equipment capable of charging those 4 cars
simultaneously. Preferred power is 350 kW. They are also requiring that publicly accessible, platform-agnostic, real-time status of DCFCs (occupancy and fault status) must be part of the solution. Further, stalls should have
slow-charging AC backup in the event of DCFC faults.
Other requirements are 24/7 access, site amenity (things to do nearby - eat, shop, recreation, toilet facilities), bay arrangement and space to cope with cars with charge ports in different positions but also future needs for larger vehicles, and enforcement of parking restrictions.
Grants for Destination Charging will open early next year.
I might meet with them again in the new year.