TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Blog NTSB "Unhappy" With Tesla's Comment on Fatal Model X Crash

Discussion in 'Tesla, Inc.' started by TMC Staff, Apr 2, 2018.

  1. TMC Staff

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,096
    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said it is “unhappy” that Tesla released information about a March 23rd crash that killed a driver, the Washington Post reported Sunday. The driver was on a busy stretch of Highway 101 when his Model X drifted out of its lane and crashed into a concrete rail. Tesla published a...
    READ FULL ARTICLE
     
  2. X-TRA

    X-TRA Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2017
    Messages:
    40
    Location:
    San Diego
    I wouldn't wait for the NTSB..need to get out ahead of the lawsuits that are sure to follow.
     
    • Like x 1
  3. Brando

    Brando Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    2,705
    Location:
    Bainbridge Island, WA
    #3 Brando, Apr 2, 2018
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2018
    NTSB should just do their job.
    I think it took almost 16 or 18 months on the last investigation of the Florida Model S crash.
    Any idea how many people die in car wrecks in a year and a half? NTSB - get to work, do your job, it might actually help save some lives.

    NTSB certainly doesn't need to be Tesla's Public Relations Department and decide what Tesla should or shouldn't say.
    Who in the world cares what NTSB thinks about any car makers press releases. Unless the auto maker tries to deceive or lie. Then a heads up would be appreciated.

    Did the NTSB help save any lives with GM ignition switch that shut off the engine and disabled the air-bag? Seems over a hundred people died from that little problem. I better stop ranting. I could go on and on after watching the US auto industry fail at safety over and over again and how little the regulators did. Took Ralph Nader (and other law suits) to help get the auto industry to consider safety over profits/cost.

    Ford Pinto - Ford actual did a cost/benefit analysis and decided that the law suits would be cheaper than fixing the fuel tank design problem. Seriously, look for your self.

    Ford Pinto - Wikipedia

    Of course, you might suspect the "auto industry/FORD" view/slant is more generous than mine. Decide for your self. You do you trust? After all, it is just business.

    NTSB - just get to work.

    PS -
    Ford Pinto > ENGINEERING.com

    "During design and production, however, crash tests revealed a serious defect in the gas tank. In crashes over 25 miles per hour, the gas tank always ruptured. To correct it would have required changing and strengthening the design."

    And yet, people will argue IF they should have fixed this little problem.
    And argue that critics were unfair. give me a break
     
    • Like x 5
    • Love x 1
  4. Fusion

    Fusion Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2016
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Tesla probably needs to let people know before people start making stories of their own.
     
    • Like x 4
  5. thegruf

    thegruf Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    indeterminate
    I am very happy that Tesla released the limited statement of facts they did.

    It confirms the AP was being used and it was prompting the driver in the expected way. It also says that the system had 5x/150m of clear view of the barrier prior to impact.

    This means that I take this into account in my daily use of AP and take extra care of AP behaviour at junctions such as this.

    Tesla's limited but prompt and timely statement has immediately improved my safety in using AP. Thankyou Tesla.

    The subsequent investiagtions into all aspects of the accident including the shocking failure to reset the attenuator after a prior accident can continue and no doubt will report in the fullness of time.
     
    • Like x 7
    • Helpful x 2
  6. markwj

    markwj Moderator, Asia Pacific

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    4,530
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    If NTSB is unhappy with Tesla releasing information about the crash, perhaps they should also similarly speak out about all information released by the media as well.
     
    • Funny x 3
    • Like x 2
    • Informative x 1
  7. mblakele

    mblakele beep! beep!

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2016
    Messages:
    1,620
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Comparing the Uber and Tesla fatalities with a table | Brad Ideas

    If Brad Templeton didn't expect this to annoy NTSB, then it may have also come as a surprise to Tesla.
     
  8. Lasttoy

    Lasttoy Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,525
    Location:
    St Augustine, Fl
    Twice the dead dummy driving did not heed the warnings. Its great that tesla is telling the world. PAY ATTENTION TO THE WARNINGS. Stop sleeping or eating, pay attention. If youve driven that part of 101? No way i would be in auto pilot.
     
    • Helpful x 1
    • Like x 1
  9. achilles992000

    Joined:
    May 16, 2017
    Messages:
    49
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Tesla did the right thing about releasing the information. it's a safety reminder to keep your hands on the wheel for autopilot.
    if releasing the information, prevents another crash then it's worth it.
     
    • Like x 3
  10. Mike75d

    Mike75d Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2017
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    Australia
    Regardless of who is at fault, this accident wouldn't have happened if AP had geo fleet learning. The computer should know that thousands of Teslas have driven the two paths within the actual lanes and that no Teslas have ever travelled in between the lines that lead to the concrete divider.
    Gps fleet learning of routes seems like it should be in place as a redundancy.
     
  11. SSonnentag

    SSonnentag Rocket Scientist

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,628
    Location:
    Arizona
    I completely agree with Elon. The more open and transparent everyone is with information such as this, the better off we all are. What are they trying to hide anyway?
     
    • Like x 3
    • Helpful x 1
    • Love x 1
  12. djplong

    djplong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
    Messages:
    505
    Location:
    NH
    If Tesla had lied about the data, then maybe the NTSB would have something to be upset about.

    In other words:

    NTSB: We're upset that Tesla is telling the truth!
     
    • Like x 5
    • Helpful x 1
    • Love x 1
  13. kpalaniswami

    kpalaniswami Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2017
    Messages:
    100
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Very true, until then never get distracted when using AP, especially replying to emails and texting. Tesla issued warning statement for a reason when using AP for not having perfected it.

    Tesla is no where ready in city/urban streets. Lot more work to be done.
     
  14. alcibiades

    alcibiades Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2017
    Messages:
    821
    Location:
    IL
    This is great, where do we find the third-party verification of Tesla's claims!

    Oh. Wait.

    Maybe in 3 moths. Definitely 6.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. iaw4

    iaw4 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2017
    Messages:
    11
    Location:
    los angeles, ca
    the ntsb usually investigates airplane accidents, where long delays between accident and report are common. they do excellent investigations, and their reports are trustworthy and objective. a lot to be said for this. however, as the dawn of autonomous vehicle approaches, they need to realize that their standard investigation model is too slow for the public.
     
    • Helpful x 2
  16. NanoGrid

    NanoGrid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2017
    Messages:
    24
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
    On Monday, ABC Channel 7 reported that the victim's brother stated:

    "...7-10 times the car would swivel toward that same exact barrier during auto-pilot. Walter took it into dealership addressing the issue, but they couldn't duplicate it there."

    Not to speak ill of the dead, but if that is true, why did the driver not have his hands on the steering wheel during the fatal approach?
     
    • Like x 3
  17. Countryboy

    Countryboy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2018
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Laguna Hills, CA
    This is a very logical problem for the lane control electronics. Whenever the system is given a choice between equally attractive alternatives, it is time to take control. I learned early, to note these conditions as they arise. You have generally 1-2 seconds to recognize the situation and be sure that the car makes the correct choice. A divide in the road, a freeway off-ramp, and similar situations are clearly a challenge. Not stated in the Tesla post was whether driver intervened at the last moment because the car selected the incorrect choice and tried to correct the steering to the correct choice. This would be a logical decision for a driver that was a bit slow in response to the situation.
     
  18. Tam

    Tam Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    7,887
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    If Tesla is expelled from being a participating member in an investigation, why that penalty is so threatening?
     
  19. Peter Lucas

    Peter Lucas Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    Messages:
    240
    Location:
    San Diego
    Often, with hands on the steering wheel while in Autopilot mode, I get warnings to put my hands on the wheel. The steering wheel sensors require a pretty heavy hand. The unfortunate driver of the car who died in this accident may very well have had his hands on the steering wheel, even though the electronic record states that he did not.
     
    • Disagree x 1
  20. sundaymorning

    sundaymorning Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,464
    Location:
    Orange County
    The driver would have been able to steer the car to the correct lane if he had his hands on the wheel, even a last second aftempt to take control would have steered the car elsewhere other than the center divider. I’ve driven AP, it doesn’t take much to catch my attention and steer the car. Sometimes the car would want to take an exit, I feel it, and steer it back. The center divider was 5 seconds away.. it only takes a fraction of a second to take control. He was likely not paying attention and hands were elsewhere.
     
    • Like x 2

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC