You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just got my car at the end of the month and we're doing our first trip from San Jose to Truckee in the Tesla this weekend.
Looks like I need to stop somewhere along 80 for about 10-20 min to get up there (the way back you don't need to charge). Looking at the two maps Vacaville "might" be outside of the blackout. Both Sacramento chargers are in the clear. Roseville is also on the edge of blackout territory. Rocklin is likely out. Chargers in Truckee itself look good.
To not overly worry my wife, I'll probably to try and stop in Vacaville or Sacramento.
I wonder if the "in car" nav will tell us if it's up or down?
I think it has everything to do with prioritizing saving money over safety. PG&E made solid profits for years (thanks to their monopoly position). And still, they invested very little in the safety of their equipment and power lines in areas with high risk of wildfires (such as moving the lines underground and clearing vegetation). They'd rather pay out huge dividends and CEO salaries. Only after the Paradise disaster did they start to do those things.Nothing to do with saving money. This is what happens when the only people still at the helm are lawyers. Between the whole Erin Brockovich thing, the San Bruno pipeline explosion, and the Camp fire, that company seems like a sociopathic nightmare of a criminal organization that exists primarily to divert funds from the public to their execs up at the top of the organization. The best thing that could happen to California would be their creditors demanding Chapter 7, shutting the whole thing down, selling off the assets, giving the money back to the shareholders, and letting the state of California buy up the infrastructure and run it as a nonprofit.
I think it has everything to do with prioritizing saving money over safety. PG&E made solid profits for years (thanks to their monopoly position). And still, they invested very little in the safety of their equipment and power lines in areas with high risk of wildfires (such as moving the lines underground and clearing vegetation). They'd rather pay out huge dividends and CEO salaries. Only after the Paradise disaster did they start to do those things.
I think it has everything to do with prioritizing saving money over safety. PG&E made solid profits for years (thanks to their monopoly position). ....
And thanks to the state regulators. The State PUC approves budgets and rate increases, as well as safety plans. Sure, PG&E sux, but it is all approved by the appointees of California Governors.
Newsom needs to step up and make the PUC accept responsibility for their enabling this cluster...
I bet there will be a surge in Powerwall sales, but only faraday or so.I bet the sale of powerwalls in CA goes trough the roof!!
Yup!I thought it was interesting that we lost power in Lafayette around 11:15PM last night, but my co-worker who lives half a mile from me got chopped 30 minutes before that.
Current state in case anyone's wondering: Powerwalls kicked in, but our home network went down due to AC frequency issues (well known on the Tesla Energy forum here), which caused a bunch of other problems that didn't seem real important to solve at oh-dark-thirty. Woke up this morning to a more sane state, got the network put back together. Solar running the house and recharging Powerwalls now.
Bruce.
It's been through every roof ever since it was announced. That's never been the problem. Tesla is refusing to install them. They should have done what they said they were going to do in the conference calls and put 50% of the battery capacity into PowerWalls. Of course they lied and then changed their mind and admitted to that years later, probably intentionally to dry up the competition. Well, it worked: now we have no competition to Tesla and there are no companies selling home electric storage solutions of any worth, besides a twice as bad option called LG.I bet the sale of powerwalls in CA goes trough the roof!!
Please correct me if I am wrong but don't you still need grid power to be able to utilize the Power Wall?It's been through every roof ever since it was announced. That's never been the problem. Tesla is refusing to install them. They should have done what they said they were going to do in the conference calls and put 50% of the battery capacity into PowerWalls. Of course they lied and then changed their mind and admitted to that years later, probably intentionally to dry up the competition. Well, it worked: now we have no competition to Tesla and there are no companies selling home electric storage solutions of any worth, besides a twice as bad option called LG.
Bruce, what are charging your neighbors to charge their phones?
BTW, a "true-sine" backup battery will keep your home network up. I have unit from CyberPower that works well. $120 or so.
No. You could have it connected to a residential solar system which would charge it during the day while the grid is down and the Powerwall would then supply power while the sun is down.Please correct me if I am wrong but don't you still need grid power to be able to utilize the Power Wall?